2024-02-27 08:31:15 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2023-06-30 19:25:58 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2022-02-26 21:23:43 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2020-06-10 17:01:10 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2018-03-18 18:47:55 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2017-07-07 10:24:08 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2016-07-17 03:58:16 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2016-07-17 03:58:16 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2016-07-17 03:58:16 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2016-07-01 01:03:53 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2016-07-01 01:03:53 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2016-07-01 01:03:53 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2016-05-24 23:00:58 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2016-05-23 19:45:25 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2015-11-06 10:16:50 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2014-06-29 20:45:45 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2014-06-29 20:45:45 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2014-06-29 20:45:45 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2014-06-29 20:44:29 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2014-06-29 20:44:29 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2014-06-29 03:15:13 +0100 | marked best answer | Distinguish between alarm() and manual interrupt I have a long computation that needs to be repeated many times with different input. I want to limit each repetition to, say, a minute. Using alarm means that if I try to manually interrupt the whole thing, it will just assume that one repetition timed out. Is there a solution that doesn't involve restarting the worksheet? |
2014-06-11 06:59:39 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2014-01-19 19:03:13 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2013-11-16 07:11:14 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2013-11-06 05:54:45 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2013-09-09 12:08:10 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2013-07-02 07:19:40 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2013-06-14 09:15:30 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2013-03-29 13:36:14 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2013-02-11 10:07:21 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2013-01-31 00:35:05 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2012-07-19 16:58:35 +0100 | received badge | ● Good Answer (source) |
2012-06-19 15:35:54 +0100 | asked a question | Best way to animate an empty chessboard with changing square colors I have an n by n chessboard (without any pieces on it) and a rule that changes the colors of some of the squares. I want an animation showing the chessboard after each change. My current way is to generate each frame using "list_plot([list of red squares],color=red)+list_plot([list of blue squares],color=blue)+...", then "animate([list of frames])". Example output: http://www.4shared.com/photo/JcjFymIV... Issues with that method: - animating a list of plots takes ages - the squares are shown as discs Can anyone recommend a better way? |
2012-05-09 20:58:58 +0100 | commented answer | Comparing Sage and Mathematica for an Introductory Course @jaia I wrote an ad-hoc javascript solution for the delay a while ago - see my answer to http://ask.sagemath.org/question/517/fast-show-for-cached-plots-for-interact . It isn't nearly good enough for distribution, but assuming you don't care about generality, it shouldn't take too much fiddling to make it do what you want. |
2012-05-01 13:25:41 +0100 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2012-05-01 08:02:17 +0100 | asked a question | Notebook bug Start a slow calculation. E.g. sleep(20). While it is running, go to another cell and try using autocomplete. E.g. type "Graph." and press tab. Ignore the fact that autocomplete is not working and type lots of code in that cell. When the slow calculation finishes, sage remembers the autocomplete request and restores the cell to its then state, erasing your new code. At least that is what happens on my computer. |
2012-05-01 07:56:33 +0100 | asked a question | Make sage not recreate plot files for sagetex When running sage on a .sagetex.sage file, it spends ages on "Initializing plots directory\n Plot 0". Most of the time I haven't changed the plots. How do I tell sage(tex) to use the files generated last time? |
2012-05-01 07:50:38 +0100 | commented question | A question on symbolic Matrices - unexpected Decimals in algebraic entry I don't have time to test this, but my guess is that mag.norm() returns something irrational, and every calculation involving it automatically converts to a real number, even if the irrational bit cancels later. In other words, you would expect 1.5/1.5 to be 1, but it is actually 1.0. And I wouldn't expect conversion to SR to convert reals to rationals; SR should support reals. But I am only guessing. |
2012-05-01 07:39:23 +0100 | commented question | Resuming a running process in Sage I suspect (but don't know) that you will need to write your own vertex_coloring function. Copy the source of the built-in function and modify it so that it saves whatever it has calculated every now and then. |
2012-05-01 07:39:23 +0100 | received badge | ● Commentator |
2012-05-01 07:32:22 +0100 | commented answer | Notebook delete revision history You are right, it doesn't work. |
2012-04-29 18:34:34 +0100 | asked a question | Notebook delete revision history How do I delete the revision history of a worksheet? I know I could copy the contents in text mode to a new worksheet; I am asking for a user-friendly way. |
2012-04-29 14:03:35 +0100 | received badge | ● Nice Answer (source) |
2012-04-29 06:27:29 +0100 | answered a question | How do I find the subsets of given Set? You don't have a set to begin with. CartesianProduct returns a special object. That object automatically converts to a list of lists when you pass it to Subsets. Then Subsets goes through that list of lists, and gets confused by the lists inside - it cannot make subsets out of them, because lists are not hashable. One way around is to use tuples instead of lists: |
2012-04-23 20:20:13 +0100 | marked best answer | Distinguish between alarm() and manual interrupt Updated: modern Sage raises an Also, it's probably a better idea to use Sure. While I would have made it a little more explicit, the KeyboardInterrupt generated by alarm does contain information that a typical KeyboardInterrupt doesn't, in the .args and .message attributes. For example, control-C in the following produces but adding So one way to take advantage of this would be through something like this: which gives I tend to wrap this stuff up in decorators, but in this case mine is nested three deep so it's probably overkill for the problem, because it makes it look more complicated than it really is. |