2023-03-27 18:39:56 +0200 | edited question | Problems with the new way to load Sagemath Problems with the new way to load Sagemath One more question in form of a suggeestion. Since the new way to install Sage |

2023-03-27 11:46:14 +0200 | edited question | Problems with the new way to load Sagemath Problems with the new way to load Sagemath One more question in form of a suggeestion. Since the new way to install Sage |

2023-03-27 11:42:55 +0200 | asked a question | Problems with the new way to load Sagemath Problems with the new way to load Sagemath One more question in form of a suggeestion. Since the new way to install Sage |

2023-03-24 19:33:50 +0200 | commented answer | Is it possible to substitute $U^\prime$ to $D_0(U)$ ? Emmanuel in economics, this is a situation one encounters often. For instance $U(w)$ is a fonction of wealth. We use to |

2023-03-23 09:37:44 +0200 | commented answer | Some questions on plot Thanks Emmanuel, you can see that I try intensively to learn SageMath and Python (Smile) |

2023-03-23 00:18:04 +0200 | edited question | Some questions on plot Some questions on plot This is a multi-form question. After this question https://ask.sagemath.org/question/67023/error- |

2023-03-23 00:10:44 +0200 | asked a question | Some questions on plot Some questions on plot This is a multi-form question. After this question https://ask.sagemath.org/question/67023/error- |

2023-03-22 23:28:43 +0200 | commented question | Error in listing a Zip My version is 9.7. But I encounter the same problem with 9.3. And sorry for the blank space. It was only a typesetting e |

2023-03-22 23:18:45 +0200 | commented question | Error in listing a Zip My version is 9.7. But I encounter the sa |

2023-03-22 16:22:41 +0200 | asked a question | Error in listing a Zip Error in listing a Zip Until the end of this code all is fine billes=[ZZ.random_element(0, 4) for i in range(50)] bill |

2023-03-14 07:18:55 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |

2023-03-12 21:41:25 +0200 | edited question | Launch Automatization for Sagemath through Docker Launch Automatization for Sagemath through Docker In connection with this question https://ask.sagemath.org/question/668 |

2023-03-12 21:41:12 +0200 | edited question | Launch Automatization for Sagemath through Docker Lauch Automatization for Sagemath through Docker In connection with this question https://ask.sagemath.org/question/6684 |

2023-03-12 21:40:45 +0200 | asked a question | Launch Automatization for Sagemath through Docker Lauch Automatization for Sagemath through Docker In connection with this question https://ask.sagemath.org/question/6684 |

2023-03-12 21:22:13 +0200 | commented question | New ways to install Sage failed ; Need help For the second way to install Sagemath, I will answer in a few time because all this demand a lot of time (start and res |

2023-03-12 21:20:45 +0200 | commented question | New ways to install Sage failed ; Need help Inside Docker there are containers. I choose the one with 8888:8888 in the ports column. I start it.Then I go to the 3 v |

2023-03-12 21:15:56 +0200 | commented question | New ways to install Sage failed ; Need help It works nicely. In the same way, if I run docker run -p8888:8888 sagemath/sagemath:latest sage-jupyter, it propose to |

2023-03-12 21:14:09 +0200 | commented question | New ways to install Sage failed ; Need help I will try to answer your question step by step since I have found a way to make Sagemath work. I have installed Docker |

2023-03-12 11:31:11 +0200 | commented question | New ways to install Sage failed ; Need help Which ever be he way i try to install Sage there is always a fail. I need a simple installation in the same way that the |

2023-03-12 11:28:14 +0200 | edited question | New ways to install Sage failed ; Need help New ways to install Sage failed ; Need help I am sorry to be obliged to ask this question. Until now, I was using the ol |

2023-03-12 11:27:32 +0200 | edited question | New ways to install Sage failed ; Need help New ways to install Sage failed ; Need help I am sorry to be obliged to ask this question. Until now, I was using the ol |

2023-03-11 23:28:17 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |

2023-03-10 16:27:45 +0200 | commented question | New ways to install Sage failed ; Need help Which ever be he way i try to install Sage there is always a fail. I need a simple installation in the same way that the |

2023-03-10 16:25:25 +0200 | commented question | New ways to install Sage failed ; Need help Which ever be he way i try to install Sage there is always a fail. I need a simple installation in the same way that the |

2023-03-08 19:21:02 +0200 | edited question | New ways to install Sage failed ; Need help New ways to install Sage failled Need help I am sorry to be obliged to ask this question. Until now, I was using the old |

2023-03-08 19:20:47 +0200 | asked a question | New ways to install Sage failed ; Need help New ways to install Sage failled Need help I am sorry to be obliged to ask this question. Until now, I was using the old |

2023-03-04 15:15:52 +0200 | commented answer | Applying a bivariate function to a list of couples I learn step by step. In all cases thank you. |

2023-03-04 15:15:13 +0200 | marked best answer | Applying a bivariate function to a list of couples I have this function : I want to applied it to The only way I found to do this is the following I wonder if there is a more efficient, elegant way to do this like with |

2023-03-04 15:15:02 +0200 | edited question | Applying a bivariate function to a list of couples Applying a bivariate function to a list of couples I have this function : def F(v,a): if v > a : |

2023-03-04 13:36:26 +0200 | asked a question | Applying a bivariate function to a list of couples Applying a bivariate function to a list of couples I have this function : def F(v,a): if v > a : |

2023-02-24 18:02:06 +0200 | commented answer | On mutating a variable to a function Emmanuel you are the expert not me. But in the documentation I have read and cited in the beginning of my question it is |

2023-02-24 12:27:07 +0200 | commented answer | On mutating a variable to a function Nice but you are obliged to change the name of the variable. |

2023-02-24 10:25:31 +0200 | edited question | On mutating a variable to a function On mutating a variable to a function In looking to the page https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/calculus/sage/cal |

2023-02-24 10:24:54 +0200 | edited question | On mutating a variable to a function On mutating a variable to a function In looking to the page https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/calculus/sage/cal |

2023-02-24 10:24:27 +0200 | asked a question | On mutating a variable to a function On mutating a variable to a function In looking to the page https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/calculus/sage/cal |

2023-02-23 22:24:44 +0200 | commented question | Displaying a smaller number of 0 for a Real call The question is ; does this approximation has any consequences in subsequent operations ? |

2023-02-23 16:39:42 +0200 | asked a question | Displaying a smaller number of 0 for a Real call Displaying a smaller number of 0 for a Real call Suppose I define the function var('A y') f(A,x,y)= A*x^.25*y^.25 If |

2023-02-18 15:06:25 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |

2023-02-18 12:54:19 +0200 | edited question | Comparing the computational time of two ways of the same result Comparing the computational tiom of two ways of the same result The two following codes accomplish the same task 1) L |

2023-02-18 12:54:10 +0200 | commented answer | Comparing the computational time of two ways of the same result Thanks Emmanuel. Should I say that a the second method is always more efficient that the first, that is working directly |

2023-02-18 12:49:43 +0200 | marked best answer | Comparing the computational time of two ways of the same result The two following codes accomplish the same task 1) 2) which can be shown by If I can fin easily the cpu computation time in adding |

2023-02-18 09:00:21 +0200 | asked a question | Comparing the computational time of two ways of the same result Comparing the computational tiom of two ways of the same result The two following codes accomplish the same task 1) L |

2023-02-18 04:12:42 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |

Copyright Sage, 2010. Some rights reserved under creative commons license. Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.