Ask Your Question

# Dox's profile - activity

2024-02-23 17:40:11 +0200 received badge  Notable Question (source)
2023-11-04 19:36:04 +0200 received badge  Famous Question (source)
2023-07-29 12:19:30 +0200 received badge  Notable Question (source)
2023-07-02 12:40:18 +0200 received badge  Popular Question (source)
2023-07-02 12:40:12 +0200 received badge  Popular Question (source)
2023-05-26 00:09:41 +0200 received badge  Nice Question (source)
2022-10-17 17:21:19 +0200 answered a question How to add latex itemize environment in sagemath markdown cell.

With a single dash as first character in the line. More info: https://www.markdownguide.org/basic-syntax/#unordered-list

2022-10-10 10:44:37 +0200 marked best answer Integrating an integral

Hi community.

I'm interested in manipulating a formal expression

$$\int \mathrm{d}t \; e^{- 2 \int \mathrm{d}t \; h(t)}.$$

My notebook contains the following code

var('t')
h = function('h')(t)
integrate(exp(integrate(-2*h,t)),t)


but the result is +Infinity.

QUESTION(S):

• Why I am getting a result if the function h is not explicit?
• Where does the +Infinity come from?
2022-10-10 10:34:52 +0200 answered a question Integrating an integral

Thanks to the comment by @fredericc I found the answer! The solution is to use the algorithm='maxima' flag, e.g. var('t

2022-10-09 17:40:21 +0200 received badge  Nice Question (source)
2022-10-09 10:34:55 +0200 asked a question Integrating an integral

Integrating an integral Hi community. I'm interested in manipulating a formal expression $$\int \mathrm{d}t \; e^{- 2022-05-16 12:36:44 +0200 received badge Notable Question (source) 2022-01-26 04:06:53 +0200 received badge Popular Question (source) 2022-01-02 20:55:01 +0200 received badge Taxonomist 2021-10-22 10:27:39 +0200 received badge Notable Question (source) 2021-10-15 17:12:09 +0200 received badge Popular Question (source) 2021-05-29 13:30:09 +0200 received badge Popular Question (source) 2021-05-18 03:35:09 +0200 received badge Popular Question (source) 2021-01-15 20:07:10 +0200 received badge Famous Question (source) 2020-12-16 22:03:13 +0200 received badge Popular Question (source) 2020-09-07 21:31:12 +0200 received badge Nice Question (source) 2020-05-20 05:37:53 +0200 received badge Famous Question (source) 2019-07-30 10:47:49 +0200 marked best answer Differential forms and tensors Dear all, A long time ago I was trying to implement a SAGE code for working with Differential Forms with values in a certain Lie algebra, but due to my lack of programming knowledge, I couldn't. This kind of objects are important for working with non-Abelin gauge theories. Question Is it possible to define and work with those objects? So far there is no reference of it in the manual. Thank you! 2019-05-20 14:11:07 +0200 marked best answer Size of Labels on a Plot dear all: I'd like to know if there is any way to change the size of the font of labels (in a plot) without changing the size of the numbers on the ticks. Thank you 2019-05-20 14:02:27 +0200 received badge Famous Question (source) 2019-05-17 21:46:48 +0200 commented answer Restricting a variable to a (real) range Thank you @dsejas Yes, your comment was incredible useful! It drove me to a nice solution. Since I had a lot of assumptions, I was trying to find a way to drop the last assumption (still don't know it possible), and looking for that I found the with assuming(condition): code statement, which execute the code assuming the condition without registering in the assumptions() list! Thank you very much! 2019-05-17 16:18:03 +0200 asked a question Restricting a variable to a (real) range Hi. I'm solving a differential equation which depends on two parameters c1 and c2. They are both positive assume(c1 > 0) assume(c2 > 0)  but in order to solve the equation, maxima ask me whether c2-3 is positive, negative or zero. With the condition assume(c2 - 3 > 0) the equation is solved; But imposing c2 - 3 < 0 triggers and inconsistency... I believe that it is due to the initial assumption. Question Is it possible to set a condition like assume(0 < c2 < 3)? 2019-05-14 09:41:24 +0200 asked a question Solving an ODE and simplifying the result I'm interested in solving the differential equation$$3 h' + 3 h^2 = c_1,$$where c_1 is a positive real number. var('t') var('c1', latex_name=r'c_1') h = function('h')(t) eq = -3*h^2 + c1 - 3*diff(h, t) eq_sol = desolve(eq, h, ivar=t, contrib_ode=True)  The above code works, but it's not solved explicitly for h, so h_sol = solve(eq_sol, h) h_sol = h_sol[0] h_sol  This gives something like$$h\left(t\right) = \frac{\sqrt{3} \sqrt{c_{1}} {\left(e^{\left(\frac{2}{3} \, \sqrt{3} C \sqrt{c_{1}} + \frac{2}{3} \, \sqrt{3} \sqrt{c_{1}} t\right)} + 1\right)}}{3 \, {\left(e^{\left(\frac{2}{3} \, \sqrt{3} C \sqrt{c_{1}} + \frac{2}{3} \, \sqrt{3} \sqrt{c_{1}} t\right)} - 1\right)}},$$in sage notation (non-LaTeX) it starts like h(t) == 1/3*sqrt(3)*sqrt(c1)* ...  Question 1: Is there a way to allocate to the solution (i.e. h_sol) the RHS of the above? without the h(t) == part. I had to set by hand (it is ease, but it would be nice to automatize the allocation) var('C') # the integration constant introduced above h_sol = 1/3*sqrt(3)*sqrt(c1)* ...  Then, by simply looking at the solution it is clear that it can be simplified. I tried things like h_sol = h_sol.canonicalize_radical() h_sol = h_sol.collect_common_factors() h_sol = h_sol.simplify_rectform(complexity_measure = None)  but none of them returns the expected result, which could be obtained from Mathematica's kernel mathematica("DSolve[3*h'[t] + 3*h[t]^2 == C[1], h[t], t]//FullSimplify") $$ \sqrt{\frac{c_1}{3}} \tanh\left( \sqrt{\frac{c_1}{3}} (t - 3 c_2) \right) 

Question 2: How could the expression h_sol be manipulated to obtain the hyperbolic tangent?

2019-02-08 13:26:30 +0200 received badge  Popular Question (source)
2018-12-04 09:18:37 +0200 asked a question Sagemanifold - Connection components from a tensor (not a metric)

Dear community.

This might sound dump, but I'm trying to determine whether a tensor satisfy the properties of a metric (under certain conditions). Of course it is a (0,2)-symmetric tensor, call it $S$, but I cannot (to my understanding) calculate the (Levi-Civita-like) connection components that would be associated to $S$... unless I declare it as a metric.

The way it is implemented makes sense... and it's solid!

## What I did...?

I defined like a metric and calculate the associated connection (and curvatures)

## Why should I do something else?

In the file src/sage/manifolds/differentiable/metric.py the metric is defined (as it should) to be symmetric, but it does not allow to consider extensions of General Relativity like say Einstein--Strauss model. Thus, I need an instance to calculate the derived quantities of a tensor that is a generalization of a metric.

### Question:

Is this possible?

2018-12-04 08:34:54 +0200 commented answer How to get the collection of all functions from X to Y in SageMath

Thanks for the theory!

2018-12-03 22:15:00 +0200 received badge  Nice Question (source)
2018-12-03 19:20:48 +0200 commented answer Subtitute functions - in a differential equation - Sagemanifold

hehehehe... Thank you again! I almost got it... but I tried .expression().

2018-12-03 19:18:45 +0200 marked best answer Subtitute functions - in a differential equation - Sagemanifold

Dear community,

I have a differential equation that depends on a function $\xi(t)$, but is a component of a tensor (calculated with sagemanifold)

M = Manifold(4, 'M', latex_name=r"\mathcal{M}")
U.<t,r,th,ph> = M.chart(r't r:(0,+oo) th:(0,pi):\theta ph:(0,2*pi):\phi')
xi = function('xi')(t)
f = function('f')(t)
h = function('h')(t)
g = function('g')(t)
Ric = M.tensor_field(0,2, 'Ric')
Ric[0,0] = 3/2*f*h - 3/4*h^2 + 3/2*f*xi + 3/4*xi^2 - 3/2*diff(h, t) - 3/2*diff(xi, t)
Ric.display()


I'd like to define the restriction to $\xi = 0$, and assign it to a new tensor

Ric0 = M.tensor_field(0,2, 'Ric0')
Ric0[0,0] = Ric[0,0].substitute_expression({xi:0, diff(xi, t):0})
Ric0.display()


but I get an AttributeError because the

AttributeError: 'ChartFunctionRing_with_category.element_class' object has no attribute 'substitute_expression'


I know that it works for functions

var('t')
xi = function('xi')(t)
f = function('f')(t)
h = function('h')(t)
ode = 3/2*f*h - 3/4*h^2 + 3/2*f*xi + 3/4*xi^2 - 3/2*diff(h, t) - 3/2*diff(xi, t)
ode0 = ode.substitute_expression({xi:0, diff(xi, t):0})


## Question

Is there a way to substitute functions that are not 𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎.𝚜𝚢𝚖𝚋𝚘𝚕𝚒𝚌.𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚘𝚗.𝙴𝚡𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚘𝚗 but ChartFunctionRing_with_category.element_class?

2018-12-03 19:18:05 +0200 commented answer Sagemanifold - only_nonredundant = True by default

Excellent! Thank you for the answer, and a wonderful use of the lambda function!

2018-12-03 19:17:27 +0200 marked best answer Sagemanifold - only_nonredundant = True by default

Hi, I find the option only_nonredundant=True really helpful, but it is annoying to type over and over the option on the notebook. Is it possible to define the option globally (within a notebook)?