Ask Your Question

Laplace of the differential of another variable in sage

asked 2012-08-21 05:47:19 +0200

anonymous user


updated 2012-08-21 09:32:02 +0200

Why did the diff(y.laplace(t,s),x) come out to be D[0](laplace)(y(x, t), t, s)*D[0](y)(x, t)? Could someone help me?

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

1 Answer

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted

answered 2012-08-21 08:05:04 +0200

calc314 gravatar image

updated 2012-08-21 08:05:41 +0200

As best I can tell, it looks like Sage is doing the chain rule here. So, it is treating laplace(y,t,s) as a symbol and gives the derivative w.r.t. x as D[0](laplace(y,t,s))*D[0](y(x,t)). Taking the second derivative gives something that looks like the product rule and the chain rule were used.

I think Sage is using Maxima to do this. So, this might be an issue with how Maxima handles partial derivatives of Laplace transforms.

edit flag offensive delete link more


Yeah, it can account for such a result. I think maybe there is something in maxima to be improved. Thank you!

yangzb gravatar imageyangzb ( 2012-08-21 09:19:40 +0200 )edit

But, as I run in Maxima:laplace(diff(f(x,t),x),t,s),it seems to output the correct answer:'diff('laplace(f(x,t),t,s),x,1). Thus there might be something wrong in sage.

yangzb gravatar imageyangzb ( 2012-08-21 23:04:03 +0200 )edit

Good catch. I'll work on submitting a ticket on this.

calc314 gravatar imagecalc314 ( 2012-08-22 16:32:57 +0200 )edit

All right:)

yangzb gravatar imageyangzb ( 2012-08-22 23:38:49 +0200 )edit

@calc314 - Please cc: me if you do get the ticket open. The formal derivative stuff still needs some better integration with Maxima - no pun intended.

kcrisman gravatar imagekcrisman ( 2012-08-24 16:39:18 +0200 )edit

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Question Tools


Asked: 2012-08-21 05:47:19 +0200

Seen: 374 times

Last updated: Sep 10 '12