Ask Your Question

Spanish numbers using LaTeX

asked 2019-06-30 06:08:29 +0100

dsejas gravatar image

updated 2019-07-01 00:18:33 +0100

slelievre gravatar image

Dear SageMath community,

I am currently writing a LaTeX document in Spanish that relies heavily on sageTeX for computations. The rules for writing numbers in Spanish are a little different from English ones. For example, we are prohibited from using commas to separate every 1000 factor, instead using a small space, only if the number is longer than four digits; otherwise, no sign should be used. On the other hand, the decimal point is actually a decimal comma. For example,

  • 1,000,000.25 should be written as 1 000 000,25
  • 123,456,789.123456789 should be written as 123 456 789,123 456 789
  • 4,000 should be written as 4000

Using sageTeX, SageMath's latex command, and LaTeX babel package, it is easy to replace the decimal point with a decimal comma. It is also easy to eliminate the commas for every 1000 factor. However, I haven't been able to put a small space instead.

I could use the siunitx LaTeX package, which has a command, \num, that does exactly this processing. However, it doesn't work with sageTeX's \sage command or any of it's environments. The only solution I can find is to apply the \num command directly to every number generated by SageMath via the latex command.

My problem is: I don't know how to do this, specially in cases where numbers are entries of a matrix, or the coefficients of a polynomial. So, how could I apply the \num command to every number independently using the latex command?

Thanks in advance for your answers! Any alternative approach is also welcomed.

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete


Thank you for pointing this Spanish rule. I was taught in school to use dots to separate every three digits. Apparently this has changed since

heluani gravatar imageheluani ( 2020-02-04 22:53:35 +0100 )edit

3 Answers

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted

answered 2019-07-05 03:40:34 +0100

dsejas gravatar image

Hello, Sage community. I was able to adapt @Juanjo's answer, but then I did some incantation (which I don't completely understand) that generalized his method. The only problem is that I had to modify the code in the file sage.misc.latex.latex. Here I describe what I did.

First of all, I made a copy of the file I just mentioned, and added a small modification of part of your code. Here is the patch:

@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
 from sage.misc.sage_ostools import have_program
 from sage.misc.temporary_file import tmp_dir

 @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
 from sage.misc.sage_ostools import have_program
 from sage.misc.temporary_file import tmp_dir

+from sage.all import RR, CC

@@ -921,6 +922,10 @@
             sage: latex((x,2), combine_all=True)
             x 2
+        if x in RR:
+            return LatexExpr(r'\num{' + str(x) + '}')
+        elif x in CC:
+            return LatexExpr(r'\num{' + str(x.real_part()) + '+' + str(x.imag_part()) + 'i}')
         if has_latex_attr(x):
             return LatexExpr(x._latex_())

I saved this as, then I made an import:

from LaTeX import latex

And here is the part I don't understand:

sage.misc.latex.latex = latex

This last line makes my new latex() function work on matrices, tuples, list, etc. automatically. (Why?)

edit flag offensive delete link more

answered 2019-07-01 17:46:59 +0100

Juanjo gravatar image

I will provide a parcial answer to the question. Let us consider the following LaTeX code:



def NumWrap(number):
    if number in ZZ or number.parent()==QQ:
        return r"\num{"+ str(number) + "}"
        return r"\num{"+ str(float(number)) + "}" 

def MatWrap(m):
    s = r"\begin{pmatrix} " 
    for nrow in range(m.nrows()):
        for ncol in range(m.ncols()-1):
            s += NumWrap(m[nrow,ncol]) + " & "
        s += NumWrap(m[nrow,-1])
        if nrow<m.nrows()-1: s += r" \\ "
    s += r" \end{pmatrix}"
    return s

Let us do a few operations with integers:
   \num{125}\times\num{8750}+\num{93251} = \sagestr{NumWrap(125*8750+93251)}.
Now, we operate with fractions, first in display math mode:
   \sisetup{quotient-mode = fraction}
   \num{12985/3425} + \num{100000/625}
   = \sagestr{NumWrap(12985/3425+100000/625)},
and now in inline math mode:
$\num{12985/3425} + \num{100000/625}=\sagestr{NumWrap(12985/3425+100000/625)}$.

It is the turn for floating point numbers and matrices.
m = matrix([[12.3456, 2.3453456],[-987654.32456, 23145.5342]])
   M = \sagestr{MatWrap(m)}.
   M^{-1} = \sagestr{MatWrap(m.inverse())}.


Suppose that x is a number coming from a Sage computation that we want to include in the LaTeX document. The Sage function NumWrap takes a string representation of this number and returns the string \num{str(x)}. This string is passed from Sage to LaTeX by the \sagestr macro, so it can be typeset. For a matrix, MatWrap applies NumWrap to each element and adds LaTeX code to get a pmatrix environment (defined in the amsmath package). I adjoin a screen capture of the document obtained after typesetting the above LaTeX code. image description

edit flag offensive delete link more


Hello, @Juanjo. Thank you very much for your answer!!! I had an awful time trying to use the \num LaTeX command through sageTeX. I could find a general solution (see my answer), but I used yours as a starting point. Thanks again!

dsejas gravatar imagedsejas ( 2019-07-05 03:42:57 +0100 )edit

answered 2020-02-02 10:16:06 +0100

sononicola gravatar image

I'm trying to create something more like the command \SI{number}{units} of siunitx package but I have some trouble.

Starting with the answer of @Juanjo I'm arrived here:

def SIsage(number,units=0):
    if units==0: 
        if number in ZZ or number.parent()==QQ:
            return r"\SI{"+ str(number) + "}"
            return r"\SI{"+ str(float(number)) + "}"
        if number in ZZ or number.parent()==QQ:
            return r"\SI{"+ str(number) + "}" +"{"+ units + "}"
            return r"\SI{"+ str(float(number)) + "}" +"{"+ units + "}"

and it works except when using \newton witch it become "ewton" problably cause to \n

After this I want to create a new custom LaTeX command that replace \SI{}{} but I have some trouble with non-default arguments. I didn't understand how them work. I want be able to use both of \SI{number}{units} that \SI{number} without units. Probably the best choise is to create two different commands(?)

\newcommand{\SISAGE}[2]{\SIsage_number{#2}\SIsage_units{#1})} #doesn't work

The command I want:


So my problems are:

  1. how to avoid \n
  2. how to set an unic custom command \SISAGE

Thanks everybody

edit flag offensive delete link more


Hello, @sononicola! Since this is a different question from my original, you shouldn't post it as an answer to my original question. This will cause confusion among user. Please, re-ask your doubt as a separate one. I have an answer for you, but I can't post it here.

dsejas gravatar imagedsejas ( 2020-02-03 16:56:28 +0100 )edit

Sorry I read this only now. I didn't receveid any notification. Thanks for your help. I have post a question right now @dsejas

sononicola gravatar imagesononicola ( 2020-02-07 07:27:50 +0100 )edit

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Question Tools



Asked: 2019-06-30 06:08:29 +0100

Seen: 923 times

Last updated: Feb 02 '20