2024-04-25 13:06:19 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2024-04-25 13:06:19 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2024-02-06 20:16:26 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2023-03-06 02:39:14 +0200 | marked best answer | Use system-wide installation of graphviz in sage? I am trying to install pygraphviz in sage 7.3 on a Debian jessy machine, but it already fails at:
I don't want to break sage, so I am wondering if there is a way to make sage use the system-wide installation of pygraphviz instead. |
2023-03-06 02:38:33 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2023-02-15 13:45:00 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2022-06-12 14:09:09 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2022-02-01 04:21:57 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2022-01-13 07:21:05 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2021-12-07 12:26:14 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2021-11-09 12:23:57 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2021-07-22 16:35:10 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2021-02-20 03:51:18 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2020-10-29 04:34:23 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2020-09-25 16:06:21 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2020-07-16 04:20:14 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2020-07-09 11:50:09 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2020-06-12 11:53:04 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2020-06-12 11:53:04 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2020-04-17 01:11:51 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2020-02-27 17:33:28 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2020-02-18 17:29:55 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2020-01-29 22:43:42 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2019-12-23 01:55:38 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2019-12-21 17:01:43 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2019-12-03 00:01:00 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2019-10-26 22:59:51 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2019-06-25 21:03:09 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2019-05-03 15:28:14 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2019-04-24 20:01:46 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2019-04-05 11:53:40 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2019-01-27 22:42:19 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2019-01-08 06:50:08 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2018-12-25 12:23:47 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Answer (source) |
2018-12-25 12:22:58 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2018-12-25 12:22:58 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2018-09-25 03:45:49 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2018-08-24 02:04:54 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2018-08-13 23:44:26 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2018-07-18 15:03:00 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2018-07-13 01:09:41 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2018-07-13 01:09:41 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2018-06-05 22:56:32 +0200 | marked best answer | sage vs. python integers and floats in pandas, matplotlib etc. I have run into a problem before, where e.g. matplotlib did not like sage floats as input for axes ranges and I had to wrap them all in np.float(). Now I found a similar problem with pandas: Is there a way to set up proper parsing for the worksheet at the onset, so that I don't have to wrap numbers and variables in the specific type needed by the respective function every time? Thanks for your help! |
2018-06-01 04:59:47 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Answer (source) |
2018-03-30 16:57:38 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Answer (source) |
2018-03-30 13:25:55 +0200 | received badge | ● Self-Learner (source) |
2018-03-30 11:12:22 +0200 | answered a question | best way to convert many notebooks from sagenb to jupyter? Certainly not the best way, but here is how I did it using the answer of @eric_g: In a terminal, show a list of all notebooks: Copy the output into the clipboard and paste into a text editor that allows block selection, e.g. geany in linux. Then create a new directory (e.g. 'fromsagenb') to make sure that you don't overwrite existing files and copy the block just containing the names into a new file in the empty folder, e.g. 'list.txt'. Now execute the following code to convert all sage notebooks in that list into jupyter notebooks: |
2018-03-30 10:32:13 +0200 | commented answer | best way to convert many notebooks from sagenb to jupyter? Thanks, but |
2018-03-21 14:36:13 +0200 | asked a question | best way to convert many notebooks from sagenb to jupyter? I moved from sagenb to jupyter a while ago, but I still have a large number of sagenb notebooks that I have been converting one-by-one on demand. Is there a way to convert all of them at once and save them to a dedicated folder? Currently, when I start sage -notebook, I get to an interface where I can see all my sagenb notebooks and I have the option to click on any of them, convert and open in jupyter. I would actually like to convert all of them without opening them. This is related to https://ask.sagemath.org/question/358..., but I suppose that there is a better way now. Thanks already for your help! |
2018-02-16 00:32:08 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |