2023-11-14 23:14:33 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |

2023-07-29 02:06:58 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |

2023-07-29 02:06:58 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |

2023-07-16 14:43:11 +0200 | asked a question | mirror site for sagemath mirror site for sagemath Hello, I have set up a mirror server at https://fosszone.csd.auth.gr/sagemath/. I didn't get an |

2023-01-30 04:18:09 +0200 | commented question | [installation error] Any idea ? same error with the released version. Finally, sudo pacman -S sagemath worked. However I am wondering if someone wit |

2023-01-30 04:17:53 +0200 | commented question | [installation error] Any idea ? same error with the released version. Finally, sudo pacman -S sagemath worked. However I am wandering if someone wit |

2023-01-30 04:16:11 +0200 | commented question | [installation error] Any idea ? same error with the released version. Finally, sudo pacman -S sagemath worked |

2023-01-30 03:44:48 +0200 | commented question | [installation error] Any idea ? same error with the released version. |

2023-01-30 01:30:04 +0200 | commented question | [installation error] Any idea ? Yes, but another error occurred: make[4]: *** [Makefile:3257: sagemath_doc_html-SAGE_DOCS-no-deps] Error 2 make[3]: ** |

2023-01-30 00:34:54 +0200 | commented question | [installation error] Any idea ? I'll try your suggestion. I use $lsb_release -a |

2023-01-30 00:34:07 +0200 | commented question | [installation error] Any idea ? I'll try your suggestion. I use $lsb_release -a |

2023-01-30 00:33:31 +0200 | answered a question | [installation error] Any idea ? I'll try your suggestion. I use $lsb_release -a |

2023-01-29 20:24:57 +0200 | asked a question | [installation error] Any idea ? [installation error] Any idea ? [sagelib-9.8.beta7] error: Command "gcc -Wno-unused-result -Wsign-compare -DNDEBUG - |

2022-12-06 15:20:05 +0200 | marked best answer | Integral with fricas In sagemath 9.7 the following code is working, however when I try it in sagecell I get an error. |

2022-12-05 20:37:32 +0200 | commented answer | Integral with fricas I meant that the command fricas(integrate(f,x)) and f.integrate(x, algorithm="fricas") provide the same results, |

2022-12-05 20:37:18 +0200 | commented answer | Integral with fricas I meant that the command fricas(integrate(f,x)) and f.integrate(x, algorithm="fricas") provide the same results, |

2022-12-05 20:37:06 +0200 | commented answer | Integral with fricas I meant that the command fricas(integrate(f,x)) and f.integrate(x, algorithm="fricas") provide the same results, |

2022-12-05 20:36:45 +0200 | commented answer | Integral with fricas |

2022-12-05 20:36:20 +0200 | commented answer | Integral with fricas |

2022-12-05 20:35:30 +0200 | commented answer | Integral with fricas |

2022-12-05 20:32:03 +0200 | commented answer | Integral with fricas |

2022-12-05 20:31:41 +0200 | commented answer | Integral with fricas |

2022-12-05 10:12:00 +0200 | commented answer | Integral with fricas The code you suggested: f = 1/(x*(x-1)^2) integrate(x, f,algorithm="fricas") does not work either on sagecell or my |

2022-12-05 09:59:00 +0200 | commented answer | Integral with fricas The code you suggested: f = 1/(x*(x-1)^2) integrate(x, f,algorithm="fricas") does not work either on sagecell or my |

2022-12-05 09:58:04 +0200 | commented answer | Integral with fricas The code you suggested: f = 1/(x*(x-1)^2) integrate(x, f,algorithm="fricas") does not work either on sagecell or my |

2022-12-05 09:57:29 +0200 | commented answer | Integral with fricas |

2022-12-05 09:32:04 +0200 | commented answer | Integral with fricas |

2022-12-04 18:38:01 +0200 | edited question | Integral with fricas Equation with assumption In sagemath 9.7 the following code is working, however when I try it in sagecell I get an error |

2022-12-04 18:37:27 +0200 | asked a question | Integral with fricas Equation with assumption In sagemath 9.7 the following code is working, however when I try it in sagecell I get an error |

2022-10-23 14:16:04 +0200 | commented question | Smith Normal Form OK. I tried this, I got different transformation matrices (for cases (1),(2)) . But the cases (1) and (3) provides exact |

2022-10-23 14:15:38 +0200 | commented question | Smith Normal Form OK. I tried this, I got different transformation matrices (for cases (1),(2)) . But the cases (1) and (3) provides exact |

2022-10-23 14:15:21 +0200 | commented question | Smith Normal Form OK. I tried this, I got different transformation matrices (for cases (1),(2)) . But the cases (1) and (3) provides exact |

2022-10-23 14:11:09 +0200 | commented question | Smith Normal Form |

2022-10-23 14:10:45 +0200 | commented question | Smith Normal Form OK. I tried this, I got different transformation matrices . But the cases (1) and (3) provides exactly the same Transfor |

2022-10-23 14:10:37 +0200 | commented question | Smith Normal Form OK. I tried this, I got different transformation matrices . But the cases (1) and (3) provides exactly the same Transfor |

2022-10-23 14:10:15 +0200 | commented question | Smith Normal Form OK. I tried this, I got different transformation matrices . But the cases (1) and (3) provides exactly the same Transfor |

2022-10-23 02:33:09 +0200 | edited question | Smith Normal Form Smith Normal Form After executing the following for computing snf of a matrix I got two different results. In the second |

2022-10-23 02:15:27 +0200 | asked a question | Smith Normal Form Smith Normal Form After executing the following for computing snf of a matrix I got two different results. In the second |

2022-07-22 17:56:41 +0200 | asked a question | Installation from source Installation from source Hi. when I compiled from source the 9.7.beta5 version, I got the following error about suitesp |

2020-10-02 13:39:25 +0200 | received badge | ● Organizer (source) |

2020-10-02 13:37:40 +0200 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |

2020-10-02 12:49:42 +0200 | marked best answer | integration in sagemath 8.1 I executed the following, and got The same integral in Wolfram Alpha provides By inspection I know that Wolfram is right. What's wrong with sage math in the specific example? |

2020-10-02 12:49:42 +0200 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |

2020-10-02 12:49:35 +0200 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |

2020-10-02 12:49:22 +0200 | commented answer | integration in sagemath 8.1 wow! I use 8.1 I need to update...Although numerical integral works |

2020-10-02 11:01:00 +0200 | received badge | ● Student (source) |

Copyright Sage, 2010. Some rights reserved under creative commons license. Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.