2024-11-24 18:09:25 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2024-07-22 14:27:33 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2024-05-30 20:32:54 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2024-05-15 21:51:22 +0100 | commented question | Installing Coxeter3 I'm running Windows 11. It looks like I only have Sage 9.5, which I'm guessing might be a/the problem, since I followed |
2024-05-14 04:24:58 +0100 | commented question | Installing Coxeter3 I got the same error message. |
2024-05-09 02:18:10 +0100 | asked a question | Installing Coxeter3 Installing Coxeter3 I'm having issues installing and using Coxeter3 When I'm in the coxeter as in the above instruction |
2024-05-09 02:01:57 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2024-04-27 16:17:45 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2024-04-27 16:17:45 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2024-02-19 14:13:54 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2024-02-11 20:05:07 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2024-02-11 20:05:07 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2023-10-26 08:19:55 +0100 | marked best answer | Why does .remove() seem to take every element out of a list? I've found that if I define a list and then try to remove an element but then returns |
2023-08-18 04:42:56 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2023-07-31 13:48:52 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2023-06-29 15:35:47 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2023-03-15 07:39:26 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2023-03-15 07:39:26 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2023-03-07 23:19:34 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2022-11-30 21:40:54 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2022-06-02 01:43:30 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2022-06-02 01:43:16 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2022-04-26 20:02:49 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2022-03-06 19:55:21 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2021-11-03 19:00:48 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2021-10-27 13:14:32 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2021-06-17 05:27:03 +0100 | commented answer | How do you assign (different) LaTex names to elements of a list? I have a bit of a follow-up, lets say I want the latex name to have a bar over it for conjugation, like $\bar{v}$. My n |
2021-06-16 22:22:47 +0100 | commented answer | How do you assign (different) LaTex names to elements of a list? Thank you! |
2021-06-16 22:22:27 +0100 | marked best answer | How do you assign (different) LaTex names to elements of a list? Say I have the following list of variables. How do I make it so that when I use the command, I get $v_{0,0}$ as output? I've tried stuff like and but it only ever give me stuff like $v_{i,j}$ where it's just the literal symbols $i$ and $j$, not the entries of for some $k$ and $m$ I plug in, like 0, 0. |
2021-06-16 21:55:24 +0100 | marked best answer | How to create lists of n-tuples efficiently? The ultimate problem I'm trying to solve, is that given two integers p and q, I would like to create a list (say "List1"), whose entries are (all of the) lists of length 2q which: 1) For all L in List1, the first q entries are between 0 and pq-1 (inclusive), and the next q entries are between pq and 2pq-1 (inclusive) 2) For all L in List1, the entries are strictly increasing, that is for all 1<=i<=2pq, L[i] < L[i+1] I have a way of doing this which is very "brute force", where I first construct the list of lists of length 1, then the list of lists of length 2, etc. I suppose I would want to convert x to a list before appending to List1, or many there's some way to iterate over lists instead of tuples. That's not so important, I just want an efficient way to construct these lists. |
2021-06-16 21:52:17 +0100 | asked a question | How do you assign (different) LaTex names to elements of a list? How do you assign (different) LaTex names to elements of a list? Say I have the following list of variables. v = {(i,j) |
2021-04-21 19:18:25 +0100 | edited question | How to create lists of n-tuples efficiently? How to create lists of n-tuples efficiently? The ultimate problem I'm trying to solve, is that given two integers p and |
2021-04-21 19:12:26 +0100 | asked a question | How to create lists of n-tuples efficiently? How to create lists of n-tuples efficiently? The ultimate problem I'm trying to solve, is that given two integers p and |
2021-03-26 14:17:01 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2021-03-26 14:17:01 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2021-03-01 09:17:33 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2021-02-26 09:08:41 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2020-12-03 06:12:49 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2020-11-23 22:16:18 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2020-08-04 18:09:30 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2020-07-11 11:58:42 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2020-07-10 21:02:22 +0100 | asked a question | Why doesn't '==' or '!=' work for mixed forms? I have the following setup Clearly Form0 and Form1 are distinct mixed forms of M, but when I run I get 'Equal' as the output, what's going wrong? |
2020-06-10 06:36:45 +0100 | asked a question | Can a loop be made to skip an iteration if the run time exceeds a certain amount? I apologize if this is a little abstract, but is it possible to create some sort of "for" or "while" loop that will pass to the next iterate if the computation for that specific iterate takes too long? we have but if for some n in the range, the computation of F(n) takes more than say, 1 minute CPU time, I want it to either just skip to computing F(n+1) and/or print "-1" in place of F(n). UPDATE: I'd also like to be able, if possible, to print out run times. So that the output would be something like etc., where time(n) is the amount of time it took to compute F(n). |
2020-06-03 16:22:54 +0100 | commented question | Are there fast(er) ways to compute inverses of Hermitian matrices? @mwageringel It's a little convoluted, by the symbolic variables I have set up are supposed to represent complex numbers, and part of the indexing reflects conjugation. Under this identification the matrices h[i] can be seen as Hermitian matrices. If you'd really like I can explain the details, but I don't think they're relevant to the question at hand. |