2022-12-02 01:06:32 +0200 | received badge | ● Good Question (source) |
2019-04-18 21:16:18 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2018-06-21 23:16:16 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2017-07-21 15:01:35 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2015-12-20 17:58:18 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2015-09-26 17:34:11 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2015-06-06 19:03:55 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2015-01-30 20:56:30 +0200 | commented answer | preparse(False) (still) not working @Christ what is about RememberInteger=Integer ... Integer=int ... Integer= RememberInteger |
2014-06-29 21:38:46 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2014-06-29 21:38:46 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2014-06-29 21:38:46 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2014-06-29 17:55:06 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2014-06-29 17:55:06 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2014-05-12 13:50:00 +0200 | commented answer | howto get Sage doctest coverage statistics @tmonteil is it also possible to get the branch test coverage for Sage? |
2014-05-12 06:22:34 +0200 | commented answer | howto get Sage doctest coverage statistics What do you think, is the number misleading? Sage uses external libraries, but their test code coverage is not recognized, if available at all. |
2014-05-12 06:20:24 +0200 | marked best answer | howto get Sage doctest coverage statistics For a particular file: For all Sage library: For Sage 6.2, the overall weighted coverage score is 93.7%. The doc is available here. |
2014-05-12 06:20:24 +0200 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2014-05-12 05:56:26 +0200 | asked a question | howto get Sage doctest coverage statistics How can a user get/see recent Sage doctest coverage statistics? Thanks, Jack |
2013-10-04 14:04:01 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2013-08-01 16:36:01 +0200 | answered a question | Add Numpy array into other Numpy array Hello,
I do not know, if this construction is useful, but you could do the following: if the number of the basic arrays are not known or is variable, Remark: it did'nt work neither with np.concatenate nor with np.append |
2013-08-01 11:18:54 +0200 | answered a question | Working with multiplicative groups Hello,
You could create an isomorphic one , e.g. for p = 7: but that is probably not what you want... |
2013-07-31 20:31:28 +0200 | received badge | ● Commentator |
2013-07-31 20:31:28 +0200 | commented answer | Testing inequalities in sage but it should! |
2013-07-31 20:31:00 +0200 | commented answer | Compare symbolic expressions I'm sorry, but this design is a failure - to return False when the result is Unknown. This should definitely be fixed. |
2013-07-29 05:16:23 +0200 | answered a question | replace values in Numpy array Hello, when assigning N to K, no data is copied, so you working on the original data, To keep the original, you need a deep copy of N: |
2013-07-27 21:01:04 +0200 | commented question | Add Numpy array into other Numpy array what did you tried so far to fill the POPOPO array? |
2013-07-27 20:49:32 +0200 | commented question | Testing inequalities in sage @eviatar-bach returning False in case can't be determined whether a relation holds seems to me unwise ; This should be changed to a tristate-answer, whatever the third state is |
2013-07-27 20:19:27 +0200 | commented question | Add Numpy array into other Numpy array Hello mresimulator, what type of arrays are the L1, L2,.. are they one-dimensional? btw, did you solve the problem already? |
2013-07-17 05:28:31 +0200 | commented question | Solve: 1-4i/4i(1+4i)^-1 is this homework? |
2013-07-16 06:54:59 +0200 | commented question | How can you stop warnings from printing? why did you not accept the answer from John? |
2013-07-16 06:54:28 +0200 | answered a question | How can you stop warnings from printing? Hello,
instead of but just for completeness, you can force Python to shut up with adding |
2013-07-16 06:41:08 +0200 | answered a question | list building - consecutive Hello mresimulator,
Then L1 to L4 gets defined: |
2013-07-12 05:18:09 +0200 | commented answer | construction of product rings Z/nZ x Z/mZ 'You can do it with just the groups' - you mean using summand_projection? 'of course that's not what you want' - yes, I would like something more comfortable |
2013-07-12 05:13:28 +0200 | commented answer | construction of product rings Z/nZ x Z/mZ Well, the question is, is there a way to construct the product ring Z/nZ x Z/mZ in sage |
2013-07-11 18:46:09 +0200 | asked a question | construction of product rings Z/nZ x Z/mZ Hello, is it possible in Sage to construct a product ring of two integer modulo rings? When just creating an cartesian_product, it is for example not possible to add its elements: |
2013-07-11 18:16:34 +0200 | commented answer | get multiplicative subgroup of Z/nZ Hello, I'm not sure if I have an account for the sagemath tracker. Did you open an issue ticket for return value of 'list_of_elements_of_multiplicative_group' ? |
2013-07-11 17:35:55 +0200 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |