2017-12-19 21:34:57 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2017-12-19 21:34:57 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2015-11-16 12:48:34 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2015-04-13 21:03:45 +0200 | received badge | ● Teacher (source) |
2015-04-11 16:29:03 +0200 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2015-04-11 13:41:34 +0200 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2015-04-11 02:30:20 +0200 | commented answer | Why is sage giving me wrong answers? There is a similar question in this thread |
2015-04-11 02:08:41 +0200 | commented answer | Why is sage giving me wrong answers? Can be written this way too or this way |
2015-04-11 01:46:27 +0200 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2015-04-11 01:37:57 +0200 | commented answer | Why is sage giving me wrong answers? OOOPs it doesn't work The error moved into he imaginary part (approx 0.5 E-16). I must edit the answer ..... |
2015-04-11 01:34:50 +0200 | commented answer | Why is sage giving me wrong answers? Sage complex numbers are based on floating points, 1+2i is implemented as 1.00000000 + 2.00000000000 * i. |
2015-04-11 01:00:20 +0200 | answered a question | Why is sage giving me wrong answers? Default complex numbers use double precision floating points and their rounding errors (which can't be avoided). Use variable from the right field and arithmetic specific to complex numbers displays |
2015-04-10 23:38:04 +0200 | asked a question | Compute the determinant of a symbolic 5x5 matrix why does the following script fail to compute the determinant of a 5x5 matrix (same problem appears with larger similar matrices 6x6 and 7x7 matrix too) ? a spurious "_e" appears in the determinant (more) |