2024-04-18 20:09:51 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2024-04-04 00:51:34 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2023-09-25 01:40:40 +0200 | commented answer | Real and imaginary part of an expression with assumptions on variables Thanks. I found how to do with GIAC. It assumes all variables are real, and you can use i for the imaginary unit. So it |
2023-09-25 01:37:51 +0200 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2023-09-25 01:37:48 +0200 | marked best answer | Real and imaginary part of an expression with assumptions on variables Hello, I have this expression: All variables are real except nu which is a complex number. I want the real part and the imaginary part of this expression. I tried with Wolfram Alpha and either it assumes all variables are complex, or, of I specify some Assumptions, it does not return the result. Is it possible with Sage ? I'm very new to Sage. I'm new to GIAC too and I didn't found how to force a variable to be real. |
2023-09-25 01:37:48 +0200 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2023-09-20 17:45:17 +0200 | asked a question | Real and imaginary part of an expression with assumptions on variables Real and imaginary part of an expression with assumptions on variables Hello, I have this expression: Exp[-(x+I*y)*sin |
2023-08-10 02:15:12 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2023-07-29 09:19:38 +0200 | received badge | ● Self-Learner (source) |
2023-07-29 09:19:38 +0200 | received badge | ● Teacher (source) |
2023-07-28 13:04:20 +0200 | answered a question | How to reproduce `elimination_ideal` with Giac ? I talked to a GIAC developer. The command to use is eliminate: eliminate([x - A*cost*cos2t + sint*sin2t, y - A*sint*co |
2023-07-25 10:38:52 +0200 | commented question | How to reproduce `elimination_ideal` with Giac ? @MaxAlekseyev I added the code in an edit. @rburing shows the equivalent Sage code, this is exactly what I do, up to the |
2023-07-25 10:37:17 +0200 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2023-07-25 10:37:17 +0200 | edited question | How to reproduce `elimination_ideal` with Giac ? How to reproduce `elimination_ideal` with Giac ? Hello, I have the following parametric equations, where cost$=\cos t$, |
2023-07-24 20:20:16 +0200 | commented answer | How to reproduce `elimination_ideal` with Giac ? Also the strange with the cos3t example is that it works if I assign numerical values to A and B, otherwise it doesn't w |
2023-07-24 20:06:23 +0200 | commented answer | How to reproduce `elimination_ideal` with Giac ? Thanks. I think there's a problem in the documentation in Giac: they say that plex is the default order, but when you do |
2023-07-24 17:41:03 +0200 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2023-07-24 17:39:52 +0200 | asked a question | How to reproduce `elimination_ideal` with Giac ? How to reproduce `elimination_ideal` with Giac ? Hello, I have the following parametric equations, where cost$=\cos t$, |