| 2025-10-26 17:04:50 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
| 2025-04-11 16:01:47 +0200 | commented question | Receiving "SignalError: Illegal instruction" calculating `jordan_form` for matrices larger than 4x4. Well, Arch updated the packages sagemath and flint yesterday an now things are working. |
| 2025-04-10 03:14:58 +0200 | commented question | Receiving "SignalError: Illegal instruction" calculating `jordan_form` for matrices larger than 4x4. Installed as a package from the official arch repos using pacman. Laptop is a ThinkPad X220. CPU data: $ grep -m1 'mod |
| 2025-04-10 02:16:45 +0200 | commented question | Receiving "SignalError: Illegal instruction" calculating `jordan_form` for matrices larger than 4x4. Installed as a package from the official arch repos using pacman. Laptop is a ThinkPad X220. CPU data: $ grep -m1 'mod |
| 2025-04-08 22:41:47 +0200 | commented question | Receiving "SignalError: Illegal instruction" calculating `jordan_form` for matrices larger than 4x4. Arch Linux. Same system I've been running on rolling release for ~12 years. |
| 2025-04-06 22:42:12 +0200 | asked a question | Receiving "SignalError: Illegal instruction" calculating `jordan_form` for matrices larger than 4x4. Receiving "SignalError: Illegal instruction" calculating `jordan_form` for matrices larger than 4x4. I recently upgraded |
| 2024-08-26 21:44:59 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
| 2024-08-26 21:44:59 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
| 2024-07-19 18:19:10 +0200 | asked a question | Is there a "compound matrix" method for matrices? Is there a "compound matrix" method for matrices? I'm surprised that if A is a matrix that there isn't a A.compound_matr |
| 2023-07-23 06:13:31 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
| 2023-07-03 19:24:02 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
| 2023-07-03 19:24:02 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
| 2023-02-09 00:22:00 +0200 | commented question | Is it no longer possible to calculate SVD in sage? Thanks for the reply. Yes, your mwe works. I think my issue is that my matrix was originally defined as a "sparse" matr |
| 2023-02-08 18:32:57 +0200 | asked a question | Is it no longer possible to calculate SVD in sage? Is it no longer possible to calculate SVD in sage? I recently noticed that the property .SVD() is no longer available fo |
| 2020-10-16 16:56:00 +0200 | commented answer | Can attributes of sage classes be changed? Really cool idea! Thanks! |
| 2020-10-15 20:46:05 +0200 | commented answer | Can attributes of sage classes be changed? This isn't quite what I want. The commas are still there and the numbers are not inside an array. |
| 2020-10-14 20:37:14 +0200 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
| 2020-10-14 20:37:12 +0200 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
| 2020-10-14 20:37:10 +0200 | commented answer | Is there a reliable way to check if an object is a vector? Ha. Had no idea this was built in. Thanks! |
| 2020-10-14 18:07:09 +0200 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
| 2020-10-14 17:57:18 +0200 | asked a question | Is there a reliable way to check if an object is a vector? I'm want to check if a given sage object This works, assuming that |
| 2020-10-14 06:03:32 +0200 | commented question | Can attributes of sage classes be changed? Are there any workarounds? |
| 2020-10-14 01:00:51 +0200 | asked a question | Can attributes of sage classes be changed? I want to change the way vectors are rendered in sagetex. For example, consider However, this code throws the following error: So, it looks like I can't modify the methods of |
| 2020-10-14 01:00:51 +0200 | asked a question | Can _latex_ methods be locally altered? I'm writing a latex document where I want all vectors to be represented differently in sagetex. Is this possible? More specifically, in sagetex, the vector |
Copyright Sage, 2010. Some rights reserved under creative commons license. Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.