2023-12-01 09:58:26 +0200 | commented answer | Overflow in list_plot? Thank you! It would work just fine for me. |
2023-11-30 09:39:53 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2023-11-30 08:10:27 +0200 | asked a question | Overflow in list_plot? Overflow in list_plot? The code: l = [1.4312706585e12, -1.4575266189e12, 4.9459419278e11, -4.8146621292e12] list_plot(l |
2023-08-17 13:49:15 +0200 | asked a question | Does sympy break CyclotomicField? Does sympy break CyclotomicField? One can define a cyclotomic field as CyclotomicField(16) for example. But the code bel |
2023-08-17 13:40:07 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2023-08-17 13:39:48 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2023-07-13 03:51:34 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2023-06-07 01:27:33 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2023-05-28 07:47:34 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2022-12-12 07:45:40 +0200 | asked a question | Are rings of integers incompatible with multiprocessing? Are rings of integers incompatible with multiprocessing? The code below crashen on sage 9.5: from multiprocessing impor |
2022-10-21 10:43:58 +0200 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2022-10-21 10:43:58 +0200 | edited question | Sage fails to check if NumberField is UFD Sage fails to check if NumberField if UFD The field Q(sqrt(-5)) if not a unique factorization domain. Yet the code below |
2022-10-21 10:43:14 +0200 | asked a question | Sage fails to check if NumberField is UFD Sage fails to check if NumberField if UFD The field Q(sqrt(-5)) if not a unique factorization domain. Yet the code below |
2022-09-28 15:22:33 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2022-09-28 07:31:45 +0200 | commented answer | Determinants over cyclotomic fields are broken? Note that if you define OK = K.ring_of_integers() L, U = matrix(OK,L), matrix(OK,U) then it magically works. Also |
2022-09-28 07:30:54 +0200 | commented answer | Determinants over cyclotomic fields are broken? Note that if you define OK = K.ring_of_integers() L, U = matrix(OK,L), matrix(OK,U) then it magically works. Also |
2022-09-27 12:58:31 +0200 | commented question | Determinants over cyclotomic fields are broken? UPD: the code works as intended if I define matrices L and U over the ring of integers of the field K. |
2022-09-27 12:58:19 +0200 | commented question | Determinants over cyclotomic fields are broken? UPD: the code works as intended if I definine matrices L and U over the ring of integers of the field K. |
2022-09-27 09:36:54 +0200 | asked a question | Determinants over cyclotomic fields are broken? Determinants over cyclotomic fields are broken? I launch the code below which generates two unimodular matrices L and U |
2022-09-25 19:11:53 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2022-08-25 13:27:44 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2022-08-25 13:27:44 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2022-08-19 12:10:33 +0200 | asked a question | NameError: name '...' is not defined NameError: name '...' is not defined I got the preparsed with sage --preparse command keflll.py file with the function i |
2022-07-12 11:19:42 +0200 | asked a question | MAC M1 Unhandled SIGILL: An illegal instruction occurred. MAC M1 Unhandled SIGILL: An illegal instruction occurred. I got MAC OS 12.4 installed and after attempting to do matrix |
2021-11-29 11:09:27 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2021-10-22 11:54:39 +0200 | commented question | FractionFieldElement works incorrectly over large fields That's my suspition as well. Is there I can do anything about this issue? I'd like to be able to handle 63 bit numbers. |
2021-10-20 20:08:59 +0200 | asked a question | FractionFieldElement works incorrectly over large fields FractionFieldElement works incorrectly over large fields The code below returns a*b/a instead of b if characteristic of |
2021-06-23 13:28:47 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2020-11-06 23:33:47 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2020-11-01 21:04:57 +0200 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2020-10-30 00:12:38 +0200 | asked a question | canonicalize_radical and evaluation return different answers This code return proof that f^8(x)=f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(x))))))))=x if f(x)=(x(sqrt(2)-1)-1)/(x-1): But this code looks directly at orbit of a point and shows that the statement above is false: By giving the next output:
Why the output is so different? Bit precision don't seem to be a problem. |
2020-10-30 00:10:19 +0200 | asked a question | canonicalize_radical() and evaluation return different answers This code return proof that f^8(x)=f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(x))))))))=x if f(x)=(x(sqrt(2)-1)-1)/(x-1): But this code looks directly at orbit of a point and shows that the statement above is false: By giving the next output: Why the output is so different? Bit precision don't seem to be a problem. |
2020-04-23 04:27:46 +0200 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2020-04-22 13:12:39 +0200 | asked a question | Substitution into polynomial defined over finite field I am new to SAGE. While attempting to substitute finite field element into polynomial over finite field instead of variable i get Thanks in advanse fot answer. |
2020-04-22 13:12:39 +0200 | asked a question | Substitution in polynomial defined over finite field I am new to Sage. While attempting to substitute finite field element into polynomial over finite field,
instead of variable i get Thanks in advance for answer. |