2022-01-29 22:12:53 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2022-01-29 22:12:53 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2020-07-17 15:53:48 +0200 | commented answer | How to plot in seperate window using Jupyter notebook? Thanks for your answer! Is there any way to make the axis labels more sharp? In my case they appear in very low resolution, while the plot itself doesn't. Another thing I noticed: For some reason no legend appears next to the plot, even though I tried coding it in. |
2020-07-17 11:17:39 +0200 | asked a question | How to plot in seperate window using Jupyter notebook? Hello Guys, I spend quite some time approximating a 1-manifold via a list of points, that I now want to plot. Is there a way to have a nice big window showing the interactive plot, instead of the small image, which is shown inline per default? I'm using something like to plot two components of the manifold in one image. Sorry, but I can't show an screenshot of the output, because I'm new here and missing points (<60) to upload :( Alternatively, I tried adjusting the figsize, but nothing changed that way. Thank you for your help! |
2020-04-06 20:11:44 +0200 | commented answer | Random errors when using Singular via Sage Thank you for helping me out again! I tried giving the functions to solve() directly and never got an error, one can also see the behavior by printing out I.primdecGTZ(). You mentioned doing in the "Sage-way" with Singular only acting in the background. Do you know about runtime advantages of one over the other? |
2020-04-06 19:04:50 +0200 | commented question | Random errors when using Singular via Sage Thanks! I'll try doing in that way and report the result. |
2020-04-06 18:12:00 +0200 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2020-04-06 18:07:09 +0200 | asked a question | Random errors when using Singular via Sage Hello everyone, I'd like to use Singulars capabilities in solving systems of polynomial equations, however I regularly obtain errors of Singular not recognizing the ring, that is created when executing the solve() command from the solve.lib Singular package. It seems somehow random to me, because the error only appears at about 30% of the time running to programm, so just giving it another try (without making any changes to the code) results in the desired result most of the time. Here is my code: It might seem complicated to create that many Ideals but it is necessary because some of them are needed more often. Executing it 10 times results in 2 to 3 errors of the following kind: Thanks for your help! Greetings Paul |
2020-04-02 14:37:07 +0200 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2020-04-02 14:32:40 +0200 | commented answer | Passing Sage functions to Singular Thanks for you fast response, your solution works perfectly. |
2020-04-02 14:26:18 +0200 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2020-04-02 14:20:07 +0200 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2020-04-02 13:16:03 +0200 | asked a question | Passing Sage functions to Singular Hello Everyone, given a polynomial $f\colon \mathbb{C}^2 \to \mathbb{C}$ in two complex variables $x, y$ together with a singular isolated point $(0, 0)$ of $f$, I try to extract information about the set of points $(x,y)\in \mathbb{C}^2: f(x,y)=0$ that intersect a small sphere ${S_\epsilon}^3 (z)$ centered at the origin. In order to obtain points $(x,y)$ satisfying both conditions, I wanted to split my two complex variables $(x,y)$ in their real and imaginary part to obtain a polynomial $f\colon \mathbb{R}^4 \to \mathbb{R}^2$ and to easily write the second condition in terms of $$ x_1^2 + x_2 ^2 +y_1^2 + y_2 ^2 - \epsilon^2 =0, \qquad x=x_1 + i~x_2, ~~y=y_1 + i~y_2.$$ I know that the solution is homeomorphic to $S^1 \cup S^1$, that's why I want to pass $f$ splitted in real and imaginary part as functions of $(x_1, x_2, y_1, y_2)$ to Singular together with the equation above, to get the two components of the solution. Everything works perfectly so far (giving the equations to Singular directly), except that I can't manage to pass the functions from Sage to singular (via the built-in Interface). I tried something like: I know how to define new functions in Singular via but how can I pass f1 and f2 to Singular and tell Singular to treat them as functions of $(x_1, x_2, y_1, y_2)$? Thanks you very much! |