2018-06-20 05:57:51 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2018-06-19 04:48:42 +0200 | commented question | Quotient ring involving Laurent polynomials Regarding Q1: Just after posting the question I realized that T0 and T1 commute in the ring in Q1, which is not my intended object. However, it's still a question I'd like to ask. If any of you is interested, for the Hecke algebra I end up using free algebra quotient |
2018-06-19 04:45:37 +0200 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2018-06-18 23:55:48 +0200 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2018-06-18 23:49:18 +0200 | asked a question | Quotient ring involving Laurent polynomials Hi all, I have actually two closely related questions: Q1 Below is a working code that involves no Laurent polynomials: The output is I want to make a q-analog of it so it will produce its (Q,q)-deformation: My attempt below didn't compile, and I'm wondering if there's a good solution to it. Q2 I'm trying to implement the most general Hecke algebra of type B2 with unequal parameters for the two nodes. This is labeled as a TODO in the Sage Reference Manual (cannot post direct link due too low karma): doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/algebras/sage/algebras/iwahori_hecke_algebra.html Does anyone know any update to this? |