2024-02-11 20:11:15 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2024-02-11 19:58:38 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2023-06-25 19:19:59 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2022-07-22 20:18:29 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2022-01-26 03:44:25 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2020-04-11 13:28:28 +0200 | commented answer | Substitute variable in differential equation Vielen Dank! I would upvote 2 times more if I could ... |
2020-04-11 08:34:58 +0200 | commented answer | Substitute variable in differential equation Just 2 more questions: How do I insert latex code here in this forum? How are the symbols D0 and D0,0 defined (result from show(divG), divG in the first version as function from r)? |
2020-04-11 07:38:56 +0200 | commented answer | substitute variable inside function great, thanks! |
2020-04-11 07:00:22 +0200 | commented answer | Substitute variable in differential equation Thanks a lot for showing me. - I got the first term of the solution by hand, but missed the second. The result has a meaning, but what it is I have to figure out, it seems the bracket contains sort of a "density operator". |
2020-04-10 18:53:00 +0200 | asked a question | substitute variable inside function I can do I tried to write a function which does this for arbitrary expressions and variables but fails miserably. It seems self.subs(symb=(symb-1)) can not be evaluated properly. How can I achieve what I want? |
2020-04-08 11:07:00 +0200 | asked a question | Substitute variable in differential equation I have which describes a spherical symmetric source term of a field, nice. Now I want to get this as a function of volume, not of radius and tried: But it gets me nowhere - It should also substitute the differentials - How to solve this? |
2017-05-19 01:52:59 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2014-01-09 22:19:21 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2013-07-11 09:46:35 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2012-12-06 13:11:54 +0200 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2012-12-06 13:11:54 +0200 | marked best answer | SAGE_FAT_BINARIES and SAGE_ATLAS_ARCH - compile for old processors Hi Emil, this is due to a logical bug in the atlas spkg: the system-wide variable SAGE_FAT_BINARY currently takes precedence over the specific variable SAGE_ATLAS_ARCH as explained in the trac ticket http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ti... A possible workaround until it is fixed is:
Ciao, Thierry |
2012-12-06 13:11:49 +0200 | commented answer | SAGE_FAT_BINARIES and SAGE_ATLAS_ARCH - compile for old processors Hi Thierry - thanks for that explanation! I will keep this in mind and when the time is ripe I will update the Live CD accordingly... cheers emil |
2012-12-05 13:23:12 +0200 | asked a question | SAGE_FAT_BINARIES and SAGE_ATLAS_ARCH - compile for old processors Hi, I recently compiled a new version of the Sage Live CD. In older versions it was enough to set SAGE_FAT_BINARIES='yes' to create a binary with low requirements on processor instructions (like "sse2" instruction set). In the newer versions I also used SAGE_ATLAS_ARCH='base' flag, but now I have a report that it is not working properly on an old pentium processor. I read something in the sage-devel group that there might be some interference between those build flags. What is the present procedure to produce a true "fat" binary which should run on possibly the widest range of hardware (without having to grant to use modern hardware to full extend). thanks |
2012-08-11 05:15:38 +0200 | answered a question | Black Screen Could you provide more specific information? Which Version of Virtual Box did you install? Did you follow the procedure in the Online documentation Sage Appliance Doc? Is it really a black screen or do you have some text on it (e.g. you mention the prompt for login?) Is it possible that you use an older version which is server only? - In this case you access the sage notebook from the windows browser (localhost:8000) best regards Emil |
2012-07-27 11:05:58 +0200 | received badge | ● Great Answer (source) |
2012-07-26 02:56:05 +0200 | commented answer | I don't find my Sage files? Happy it worked ;-). The above procederes might be necessary if you you wan't to upgrade to a new virtual machine (without the built in upgrade mechanism of sage). |
2012-07-25 13:11:43 +0200 | received badge | ● Good Answer (source) |
2012-07-25 12:34:39 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Answer (source) |