2016-08-02 13:36:05 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |

2015-01-18 01:43:05 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |

2014-01-20 10:28:10 -0500 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |

2014-01-20 10:28:10 -0500 | marked best answer | simplify_full - is the mistake in the documentation or the source code? Good catch ! Thanks for reporting. |

2014-01-18 19:57:16 -0500 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |

2014-01-18 01:53:24 -0500 | received badge | ● Student (source) |

2014-01-17 09:38:00 -0500 | asked a question | simplify_full - is the mistake in the documentation or the source code? Looking at the simplify_full documentation in Sage 6.0, it says that it
However the source code is So where is the mistake? Should simplify_radical be added to the source code or removed from the documentation? |

2014-01-15 20:57:21 -0500 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |

2014-01-15 13:17:23 -0500 | asked a question | How to simplify log expressions that result in an integer? I'm having problems with Sage not simplifying log expressions that result in an integer. For example returns despite the fact that the more correct answer is [x == 2]. Is there any way to get Sage to simplify expressions like this to an integer? I already tried and but in both cases the expression was returned unchanged. I know it is possible to estimate the value (e.g. with n(log(4)/log(2)) ) or manually rewrite the expression to log(4, 2), but those workarounds are far from optimal. |

Copyright Sage, 2010. Some rights reserved under creative commons license. Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.