2021-04-03 08:26:54 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2020-05-03 09:48:48 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2016-08-15 07:17:52 +0200 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2016-08-15 06:20:00 +0200 | commented answer | Polar coordinates with negative angle Ohh... is that true even if I evaluate the first example and then edit it to change it into the second? (Not a very helpful error message, in that case...) |
2016-08-12 20:55:19 +0200 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2016-08-12 20:54:29 +0200 | asked a question | Polar coordinates with negative angle Following the sagemanifolds tutorial I can make $\mathbb{R}^2$ with rectangular and polar coordinates: This uses the range $(0,2\pi)$ for $\theta$, excluding the positive $x$-axis. But if I try to use instead the range $(-\pi,\pi)$ for $\theta$, excluding the negative $x$-axis: SageMathCloud gives me "ValueError: Assumption is redundant". But strangely, SageMathCell doesn't complain at all. What is the problem? |
2016-08-12 20:41:22 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2015-08-04 10:05:05 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2013-12-05 13:29:59 +0200 | commented answer | Symbolic functions without named variables Okay, I guess I see what the developers were thinking, even if I don't agree with it. (Wouldn't "coproduct" be a more appropriate term?) |
2013-12-02 23:50:22 +0200 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2013-12-02 23:49:58 +0200 | commented answer | Symbolic functions without named variables I'm trying to understand this. Is the expression tree really necessary? It seems like a wrapper around a callable symbolic expression that knows how to reset the variables as needed might be sufficient for what I want. For instance, could you also overload function application, addition, etc.? |
2013-12-02 23:34:28 +0200 | commented answer | Symbolic functions without named variables Hmm... if it were really consistent about behaving this way, then I would expect `f+h` to be a type error, since you can't add elements of different rings. |
2013-12-02 23:31:29 +0200 | commented answer | Symbolic functions without named variables Thanks! Why do you refer to defining mathematical functions as "adding more semantics"? |
2013-11-29 09:27:53 +0200 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2013-11-27 15:33:17 +0200 | asked a question | Symbolic functions without named variables Is there a way to define a symbolic function that can (e.g.) be differentiated, but doesn't remember the name of its input variable(s)? For instance, consider: Mathematically, f, g, and h, should all be the same function. However, Sage doesn't think so: I guess that this is happening because a "function" defined with |