2023-09-21 05:08:01 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2020-08-27 17:07:37 +0200 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2018-09-28 07:25:52 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2015-10-29 13:11:53 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2013-10-30 16:24:16 +0200 | marked best answer | can sage stop ordering terms? Short answer is "probably not, unless you want to muck about in the internals of Ginac/Pynac, our symbolics engine". Even this one reorders: I think that some symbolics programs find a semi-canonical ordering and stick with that... Interestingly, so the minus sign comes out only with the fraction. It's conceivable that one could consider this inconsistency a bug, though I am not qualified to assess that. That said, perhaps one could make a feature request to control this, though I suspect this would be harder than one thinks. |
2013-10-30 16:24:16 +0200 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2013-10-25 13:54:56 +0200 | commented answer | can sage stop ordering terms? If I had to guess, I'd say that Sage tries to guess the order of each term and sorts them accordingly. `x^3` will probably come before `x^2`, etc. |
2013-10-25 13:52:49 +0200 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2013-10-24 13:15:23 +0200 | commented answer | can sage stop ordering terms? We definitely want B+A+B to become 2A+B, but I'm in a situation that I don't want B+2A to become 2A+B. That pretty much sums it up :) Thanks for the effort on the function! Looks good for simple expressions, though I doubt this approach can be flexible enough for more complex expressions, e.g. fractions, several parenthesis etc. |
2013-10-24 08:58:50 +0200 | asked a question | can sage stop ordering terms? Noob question incoming...
What I would like/expect to get here is Rationale - the expression ultimately goes to |