Hello!
I discovered today that one cannot use the *marker* property with *list_plot()*. So I would like to know if this hasn't been implemented yet (but planned) or there is another way to be used?

Thanks

1 | initial version |

Hello!
I discovered today that one cannot use the *marker* property with *list_plot()*. So I would like to know if this hasn't been implemented yet (but planned) or there is another way to be used?

Thanks

2 | a partial work-around found |

Hello!
I discovered today that one cannot use the *marker* property with *list_plot()*. So I would like to know if this hasn't been implemented yet (but planned) or there is another way to be used?

~~Thanks~~Thanks!

**Edit:** I tried to use

```
list_plot(DATA_LIST, plotjoined=True, linestyle="", marker='v')
```

and it indeed let me use different form of markers, but in the case when *DATA_LIST* consists of only one element, the point placed incorrectly on the resulting plot.

3 | a complete work-around suggested |

*marker* property with *list_plot()*. So I would like to know if this hasn't been implemented yet (but planned) or there is another way to be used?

Thanks!

**Edit:** I tried to use

```
list_plot(DATA_LIST, plotjoined=True, linestyle="", marker='v')
```

and it indeed let me use different form of markers, but in the case when *DATA_LIST* consists of only one element, the point placed incorrectly on the resulting plot.

**Edit 2:** I remembered that there were some problems associated with the logarithmic scales on the axes. That is why I re-read this thread and realized that I have to add an *axes_pad=0* parameter in order to get the correctly placed points. So the resuling work-around would look like this:

```
list_plot(DATA_LIST, plotjoined=True, linestyle="", marker='v', axes_pad=0)
```

4 | loglog scale added |

*marker* property with *list_plot()*. So I would like to know if this hasn't been implemented yet (but planned) or there is another way to be used?

Thanks!

**Edit:** I tried to use

```
list_plot(DATA_LIST, plotjoined=True, linestyle="", marker='v')
```

and it indeed let me use different form of markers, but in the case when *DATA_LIST* consists of only one element, the point placed incorrectly on the resulting plot.

**Edit 2:** I remembered that there were some problems associated with the logarithmic scales on the axes. That is why I re-read this thread and realized that I have to add an *axes_pad=0* parameter in order to get the correctly placed points. So the resuling work-around for a *loglog* scale would look like this:

```
list_plot(DATA_LIST, plotjoined=True, linestyle="", marker='v', scale='loglog', axes_pad=0)
```

5 | No.5 Revision |

*marker* property with *list_plot()*. So I would like to know if this hasn't been implemented yet (but planned) or there is another way to be used?

Thanks!

**Edit:** I tried to use

```
list_plot(DATA_LIST, plotjoined=True, linestyle="", marker='v')
```

*DATA_LIST* consists of only one element, the point placed incorrectly on the resulting plot.

**Edit 2:** I remembered that there were some problems associated with the logarithmic scales on the axes. That is why I re-read ~~this thread and realized that I have to add an ~~*axes_pad=0* parameter in order to get the correctly placed points. So the resuling work-around for a *loglog* scale would look like this:

```
list_plot(DATA_LIST, plotjoined=True, linestyle="", marker='v', scale='loglog', axes_pad=0)
```

6 | No.6 Revision |

*marker* property with *list_plot()*. So I would like to know if this hasn't been implemented yet (but planned) or there is another way to be used?

Thanks!

**Edit:** I tried to use

```
list_plot(DATA_LIST, plotjoined=True, linestyle="", marker='v')
```

*DATA_LIST* consists of only one element, the point placed incorrectly on the resulting plot.

**Edit 2:** I remembered that there were some problems associated with the logarithmic scales on the axes. That is why I re-read ~~this thread and realized that I have to add an ~~*axes_pad=0* parameter in order to get the correctly placed points. So the resuling work-around for a *loglog* scale would look like this:

```
list_plot(DATA_LIST, plotjoined=True, linestyle="", marker='v', scale='loglog', axes_pad=0)
```

7 | retagged |

*marker* property with *list_plot()*. So I would like to know if this hasn't been implemented yet (but planned) or there is another way to be used?

Thanks!

**Edit:** I tried to use

```
list_plot(DATA_LIST, plotjoined=True, linestyle="", marker='v')
```

*DATA_LIST* consists of only one element, the point placed incorrectly on the resulting plot.

**Edit 2:** I remembered that there were some problems associated with the logarithmic scales on the axes. That is why I re-read this thread and realized that I have to add an *axes_pad=0* parameter in order to get the correctly placed points. So the resuling work-around for a *loglog* scale would look like this:

```
list_plot(DATA_LIST, plotjoined=True, linestyle="", marker='v', scale='loglog', axes_pad=0)
```

Copyright Sage, 2010. Some rights reserved under creative commons license. Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.