The commands
```
A1.<x>=AffineSpace(1, QQ)
X=A1.subscheme([x^1789+x])
Q=X([0])
Q.multiplicity()
```

result in 1789.
There seems to be a bug in the multiplicity command for subschemes of the line.

1 | initial version |

The commands
```
A1.<x>=AffineSpace(1, QQ)
X=A1.subscheme([x^1789+x])
Q=X([0])
Q.multiplicity()
```

result in 1789.
There seems to be a bug in the multiplicity command for subschemes of the line.

2 | retagged |

The commands
```
A1.<x>=AffineSpace(1, QQ)
X=A1.subscheme([x^1789+x])
Q=X([0])
Q.multiplicity()
```

result in 1789.
There seems to be a bug in the multiplicity command for subschemes of the line.

3 | retagged |

```
A1.<x>=AffineSpace(1, QQ)
X=A1.subscheme([x^1789+x])
Q=X([0])
Q.multiplicity()
```

result in 1789.
There seems to be a bug in the multiplicity command for subschemes of the line.

4 | retagged |

```
A1.<x>=AffineSpace(1, QQ)
X=A1.subscheme([x^1789+x])
Q=X([0])
Q.multiplicity()
```

result in 1789.
There seems to be a bug in the multiplicity command for subschemes of the line.

Copyright Sage, 2010. Some rights reserved under creative commons license. Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.