The commands
A1.<x>=AffineSpace(1, QQ)
X=A1.subscheme([x^1789+x])
Q=X([0])
Q.multiplicity()
result in 1789.
There seems to be a bug in the multiplicity command for subschemes of the line.
![]() | 1 | initial version |
The commands
A1.<x>=AffineSpace(1, QQ)
X=A1.subscheme([x^1789+x])
Q=X([0])
Q.multiplicity()
result in 1789.
There seems to be a bug in the multiplicity command for subschemes of the line.
![]() | 2 | retagged |
The commands
A1.<x>=AffineSpace(1, QQ)
X=A1.subscheme([x^1789+x])
Q=X([0])
Q.multiplicity()
result in 1789.
There seems to be a bug in the multiplicity command for subschemes of the line.
![]() | 3 | retagged |
The commands
A1.<x>=AffineSpace(1, QQ)
X=A1.subscheme([x^1789+x])
Q=X([0])
Q.multiplicity()
result in 1789.
There seems to be a bug in the multiplicity command for subschemes of the line.
![]() | 4 | retagged |
The commands
A1.<x>=AffineSpace(1, QQ)
X=A1.subscheme([x^1789+x])
Q=X([0])
Q.multiplicity()
result in 1789.
There seems to be a bug in the multiplicity command for subschemes of the line.