Ask Your Question

having trouble with multi core support on 64bit Sage 4.8 on an Ubuntu 10 guest under VMWare Workstation 7

asked 2012-05-16 22:33:34 +0200

Dug_the_Math_Guy gravatar image

updated 2016-07-05 22:01:25 +0200

FrédéricC gravatar image

Hi Sage people, I installed Ubuntu 10.04 LTS desktop as a guest virtual machine under WIndows 7 as host on a 64-bit quad core with a Sandy Bridge i7 CPU. Like VMWare suggests I choose the number of processors as 4 when I set up the virtual machine ( it actually has 4 physical processors but they use hyper threading so it has 8 logical processors ) Everything has run fine so far but when I set up Sage 4.8 from a binary installation, I get errors like this: Error: object 'sage2' not found except the number after sage varies ( I believe it goes from 0 to 3 ) These errors seem to happen when I try to access R through Sage notebooks, I'm not positive they are limited to this context. I am new to Sage but as far as I can tell this means it is having trouble supporting the multiple cores. There should be objects sage0,sage1,sage2,sage3 that run on different cores? Am I right so far? If so, does anybody know why I am having issues like this? Is it possible I installed it wrong? Or is it more of an issue of Sage running under a VMWare Workstation VM? Any thoughts would help. Doug

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

2 Answers

Sort by » oldest newest most voted

answered 2012-05-16 23:30:14 +0200

Dug_the_Math_Guy gravatar image
edit flag offensive delete link more

answered 2012-05-16 23:15:54 +0200

Dug_the_Math_Guy gravatar image

OK, it looks like everything I thought was wrong. I am having the same problem running R through Sage with another computer that has a single processor, 32 bits and is running Ubuntu 12 without a virtual machine. So now its a completely different question and it appears to have to do with the Sage - R interface ( although I could be completely wrong again ). I think it makes sense to start a new question since the title to this one is completely irrelevant and misleading now. Hope that's not violating any principles of this forum.

edit flag offensive delete link more


Probably you should have just edited your original question. But it's okay! Can we close this one?

kcrisman gravatar imagekcrisman ( 2012-05-16 23:43:44 +0200 )edit

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Question Tools


Asked: 2012-05-16 22:33:34 +0200

Seen: 653 times

Last updated: May 16 '12