Obtaining signed permutation in the bruhat poset in another form

Poset

asked 2021-03-19 19:46:59 +0100

klaaa
691 ●4 ●17 ●41

updated 2021-03-20 18:46:50 +0100

(I edited the question, to make it more clear)

When I input the Bruhat poset of type Bn in Sage as follows

W = WeylGroup("B2", prefix="s") 
P = W.bruhat_poset() 
display(plot(P))

the elements look like s2*s1*s2.

Question: Is there a way to represent (in the picture of the poset in Sage) the elements in the form of signed permutation as for example findstat does (see for example http://www.findstat.org/StatisticsDat... ) but so that - is replaced by 0 and brackets and commas are ommited? So for example all signed permutations for $n=2$ would look as follows in this notation:

(The motivation is that one can use the code in the thread https://ask.sagemath.org/question/562... to obtain the quiver algebra in GAP with names one can regognize later).

Thanks for any help

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

Comments

We have

sage: W=ColoredPermutations(4,2)                                                
sage: W.category()                                                              
Category of well generated finite irreducible complex reflection groups

but this has no Bruhat order method.

FrédéricC ( 2021-03-19 20:49:19 +0100 )edit

And we have

sage: W=CoxeterGroup(['B',3])                                                   
sage: W.category()                                                              
Category of finite irreducible coxeter groups
sage: W.an_element()                                                            
[ 0  1 -a]
[ 1  1 -a]
[ 0  a -1]

which you may want to try.

FrédéricC ( 2021-03-19 20:50:47 +0100 )edit

add a comment

sage: W = WeylGroup("B2", prefix="s") sage: w=W.an_element() sage: w.to_permutation() (2, -1)

sage: def new_label(w): ....: return ''.join(str(u) for u in w.to_permutation()).replace('-','0') sage: W.bruhat_poset().relabel(new_label) Finite poset containing 8 elements

Comments

Thanks, but it seems that in this form the code of the other thread can not be applied to the poset. I will do some more tests.

klaaa ( 2021-03-19 21:05:06 +0100 )edit

add a comment

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Obtaining signed permutation in the bruhat poset in another form

Comments

1 Answer

Comments

Your Answer

Question Tools

Stats

Related questions

Obtaining signed permutation in the bruhat poset in another form edit

Comments

1 Answer

Comments

Your Answer

Question Tools

Stats

Related questions

Obtaining signed permutation in the bruhat poset in another form