Ask Your Question
3

Morphism from FiniteRankFreeModule to CliffordAlgebra

asked 2020-04-25 06:25:35 -0500

RStorm gravatar image

Suppose you have a finite rank free module with a basis:

M = FiniteRankFreeModule(QQ, 4, name='M', start_index=1)
m = M.basis('m');

and a Clifford algebra

Q = QuadraticForm(QQ,-2*matrix.identity(4))    
V.<e1,e2,e3,e4> = CliffordAlgebra(Q)

Is there a way to implement the quantization map $q:T(M)\to V$ from the tensor algebra to the Clifford algebra? It should satisfy $q(1) = 1$, $q(m[i]) = e_i$ and $q(a \otimes b) = q(a)*q(b)$.

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

1 answer

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted
3

answered 2020-04-26 04:47:20 -0500

mwageringel gravatar image

updated 2020-04-29 12:13:46 -0500

In this case, the tensor algebra of $M$ could be defined as free algebra in Sage:

sage: Q = QuadraticForm(QQ, -2 * matrix.identity(4))
sage: V.<e1,e2,e3,e4> = CliffordAlgebra(Q)
sage: T.<m1,m2,m3,m4> = FreeAlgebra(QQ); T
Free Algebra on 4 generators (m1, m2, m3, m4) over Rational Field

To define the map $q$, usually it should be enough to specify the images of the four algebra generators of T, but unfortunately, in this case, this is not implemented yet:

sage: q = T.hom(V.gens(), V, check=False)
sage: q(m1)
...
NotImplementedError:

Instead, we define the map as a map of vector spaces, by specifying the images of a vector space basis of T. The basis elements are indexed by the free monoid on four generators. The monoid elements are the ones that on_basis receives.

sage: T.indices()
Free monoid on 4 generators (m1, m2, m3, m4)
sage: # map the free monoid generators to generators of V
sage: convert_index = dict(zip(T.indices().gens(), V.gens()))
sage: # map the free monoid elements to elements of V
sage: q = T.module_morphism(on_basis=lambda a: V.prod(convert_index[ai]^ni for ai, ni in a),
....:                       codomain=V)

Now we can check that q indeed has the correct properties. Here, B is a list of some small elements of the vector space basis of T.

sage: q(T(1)), q(m1), q(m2), q(m3), q(m4)
(1, e1, e2, e3, e4)
sage: B = list(T.basis().iterator_range(0, 50))
sage: all(q(a * b) == q(a) * q(b) for a in B for b in B)
True

Edit:

If you want to work to work with FiniteRankFreeModule, this is more difficult. It is not possible to construct the tensor algebra of FiniteRankFreeModule in Sage (as of 9.1). If you only have homogeneous elements, here is what you could do:

M = FiniteRankFreeModule(QQ, 4, name='M', start_index=1)
m = M.basis('m')
Q = QuadraticForm(QQ, -2 * matrix.identity(4))
V.<e1,e2,e3,e4> = CliffordAlgebra(Q)

def q(t):
    comp = t.components()  # uses the default basis of M
    def components_iter():
        for idx in comp.index_generator():
            c = comp[idx]
            if not c.is_zero():
                yield V.prod(V.gen(j - comp._sindex) for j in idx), c
    return V.linear_combination(components_iter())

Example:

sage: q(m[1]*m[2]*m[3] + m[2]*m[3]*m[4] + m[1]*m[2]*m[2])
e1*e2*e3 + e2*e3*e4 - e1

Here, q is just a Python function, not a morphism, as the domain of this morphism cannot be constructed in Sage.

Another problem with this is that this ignores any sparsity that might be present, so this becomes very slow for higher order tensors, even if they are very sparse. If your tensors have been constructed without any kind of symmetry, you could replace comp.index_generator() by comp._comp to iterate only over the non-zero entries.

edit flag offensive delete link more

Comments

Thank you for your answer. I like it, but I don't think it is very useful for me. I found the implementation of tensors on free modules of finite rank about a week ago and like some things about it. For example the ability to contract tensors using abstract index notation. If I work with a free algebra all of this is lost. A 'hacky solution' would be to convert a tensor to a string and replace the 'm' by 'e', e.g. eval('m1*m1*m2'.replace('m','e')).

RStorm gravatar imageRStorm ( 2020-04-29 04:22:44 -0500 )edit

I have updated my answer with an example using FiniteRankFreeModule.

mwageringel gravatar imagemwageringel ( 2020-04-29 12:17:24 -0500 )edit

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Question Tools

1 follower

Stats

Asked: 2020-04-25 06:25:35 -0500

Seen: 77 times

Last updated: Apr 29