Ask Your Question
1

Finite graphs in latex

asked 2017-11-11 05:54:21 +0100

chebolu gravatar image

I want to have a finite graph G on 10 vertices in my latex document. I thought the easiest way to get it is to first draw it sage notebook using the graph_editor(). Then use latex(G) to get the latex code and copy and paste it. But when I do this, I keep getting errors. It says undefined control sequence for \Vertex..

Is there any example which will walk me through these steps? Many thanks for your help,

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

2 Answers

Sort by » oldest newest most voted
1

answered 2017-11-11 10:33:31 +0100

tmonteil gravatar image

To do it that way, you need to use the package tkz-graph, by adding the following to the header of your LaTeX file:

\usepackage{tkz-graph}

On Debian GNU/Linux (or Ubuntu), you have to install the texlive-pictures package

For more details, see:

sage: sage.graphs.graph_latex?
edit flag offensive delete link more
1

answered 2017-11-11 15:44:09 +0100

Sébastien gravatar image

updated 2017-11-11 15:45:07 +0100

After installing dot2tex with

sage -i dot2tex

and with graphviz installed, you may create a tikzpicture from the positions of vertices decided by graphviz:

sage: G = graphs.AztecDiamondGraph(2)
sage: G.latex_options().set_options(format='dot2tex', prog='dot', edge_labels=True, color_by_label=False)

The tikzpicture code is:

sage: latex(G)
\begin{tikzpicture}[>=latex,line join=bevel,]
%%
\node (node_9) at (26.5bp,8.5bp) [draw,draw=none] {$\left(2, 3\right)$};
  \node (node_8) at (61.5bp,61.5bp) [draw,draw=none] {$\left(2, 2\right)$};
  \node (node_7) at (90.5bp,114.5bp) [draw,draw=none] {$\left(2, 1\right)$};
  \node (node_6) at (114.5bp,167.5bp) [draw,draw=none] {$\left(2, 0\right)$};
  \node (node_5) at (14.5bp,61.5bp) [draw,draw=none] {$\left(1, 3\right)$};
  \node (node_4) at (32.5bp,114.5bp) [draw,draw=none] {$\left(1, 2\right)$};
  \node (node_3) at (67.5bp,167.5bp) [draw,draw=none] {$\left(1, 1\right)$};
  \node (node_2) at (102.5bp,220.5bp) [draw,draw=none] {$\left(1, 0\right)$};
  \node (node_1) at (20.5bp,167.5bp) [draw,draw=none] {$\left(0, 2\right)$};
  \node (node_0) at (32.5bp,220.5bp) [draw,draw=none] {$\left(0, 1\right)$};
  \node (node_11) at (96.5bp,8.5bp) [draw,draw=none] {$\left(3, 2\right)$};
  \node (node_10) at (108.5bp,61.5bp) [draw,draw=none] {$\left(3, 1\right)$};
  \draw [black,] (node_0) ..controls (44.282bp,202.33bp) and (55.687bp,185.71bp)  .. (node_3);
  \draw [black,] (node_4) ..controls (42.262bp,96.332bp) and (51.712bp,79.713bp)  .. (node_8);
  \draw [black,] (node_4) ..controls (26.441bp,96.332bp) and (20.575bp,79.713bp)  .. (node_5);
  \draw [black,] (node_8) ..controls (49.718bp,43.332bp) and (38.313bp,26.713bp)  .. (node_9);
  \draw [black,] (node_3) ..controls (55.718bp,149.33bp) and (44.313bp,132.71bp)  .. (node_4);
  \draw [black,] (node_6) ..controls (106.42bp,149.33bp) and (98.6bp,132.71bp)  .. (node_7);
  \draw [black,] (node_5) ..controls (18.539bp,43.332bp) and (22.45bp,26.713bp)  .. (node_9);
  \draw [black,] (node_8) ..controls (73.282bp,43.332bp) and (84.687bp,26.713bp)  .. (node_11);
  \draw [black,] (node_1) ..controls (24.539bp,149.33bp) and (28.45bp,132.71bp)  .. (node_4);
  \draw [black,] (node_2) ..controls (90.718bp,202.33bp) and (79.313bp,185.71bp)  .. (node_3);
  \draw [black,] (node_7) ..controls (80.738bp,96.332bp) and (71.288bp,79.713bp)  .. (node_8);
  \draw [black,] (node_2) ..controls (106.54bp,202.33bp) and (110.45bp,185.71bp)  .. (node_6);
  \draw [black,] (node_0) ..controls (28.461bp,202.33bp) and (24.55bp,185.71bp)  .. (node_1);
  \draw [black,] (node_10) ..controls (104.46bp,43.332bp) and (100.55bp,26.713bp)  .. (node_11);
  \draw [black,] (node_7) ..controls (96.559bp,96.332bp) and (102.42bp,79.713bp)  .. (node_10);
  \draw [black,] (node_3) ..controls (75.242bp,149.33bp) and (82.737bp,132.71bp)  .. (node_7);
%
\end{tikzpicture}

You may get a preview:

sage: view(G)

image description

edit flag offensive delete link more

Comments

Note that with this method, graphviz recomputes the positions of the vertices. In the case of the Aztec diamond, the positions are set to fit within the integer lattice ZZ^2.

Compare with:

sage: G.plot()
tmonteil gravatar imagetmonteil ( 2017-11-11 17:11:45 +0100 )edit

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Question Tools

Stats

Asked: 2017-11-11 05:54:21 +0100

Seen: 619 times

Last updated: Nov 11 '17