1 | initial version |

For the first issue, you can replace

```
sage: R.<x> = ZZ[]
```

with

```
sage: R.<x> = PolynomialRing(ZZ,1)
```

It looks stupid, but the univariate polynomial ring is not the same as the multivariate polynomial ring in one variable, the first one is implemented in Sage and the second relies on `Singular`

, also they do not have the same methods available.

Reegarding the creation of ideals, in the first case, it seems that the method is inherited from a generic parent class, while the second has its own ideal method:

```
sage: R.<x> = ZZ[]
sage: R.ideal
<built-in method ideal of PolynomialRing_integral_domain_with_category object at 0x7f40f95402c8>
sage: R.<x> = PolynomialRing(ZZ,1)
sage: R.ideal
<built-in method ideal of sage.rings.polynomial.multi_polynomial_libsingular.MPolynomialRing_libsingular object at 0x7f40f4ecc4f8>
```

With this second implementation, you can check:

```
sage: R.<x> = PolynomialRing(ZZ,1)
sage: I = R.ideal(4,2*x,x^2)
sage: S.<a> = R.quotient(I)
sage: a^2
0
sage: 2*a
0
sage: S(2) + S(2)
0
```

So far, so good. Now, regarding your second issue, there is no problem that

```
sage: S(2) + S(3)
5
```

as this is correct. However, there seems to be a problem with the following:

```
sage: S(2) + S(3) == S(1)
False
```

Note that, however :

```
sage: S(2) + S(3) - S(1)
0
```

Perhaps should we investigate a bit further on where the problem is exactly and report this as a bug.

2 | No.2 Revision |

For the first issue, you can replace

```
sage: R.<x> = ZZ[]
```

with

```
sage: R.<x> = PolynomialRing(ZZ,1)
```

It looks stupid, but the univariate polynomial ring is not the same as the multivariate polynomial ring in one variable, the first one is implemented in Sage and the second relies on `Singular`

, also they do not have the same methods available.

Reegarding the creation of ideals, in the first case, it seems that the method is inherited from a generic parent class, while the second has its own ideal method:

```
sage: R.<x> = ZZ[]
sage: R.ideal
<built-in method ideal of PolynomialRing_integral_domain_with_category object at 0x7f40f95402c8>
sage: R.<x> = PolynomialRing(ZZ,1)
sage: R.ideal
<built-in method ideal of sage.rings.polynomial.multi_polynomial_libsingular.MPolynomialRing_libsingular object at 0x7f40f4ecc4f8>
```

With this second implementation, you can check:

```
sage: R.<x> = PolynomialRing(ZZ,1)
sage: I = R.ideal(4,2*x,x^2)
sage: S.<a> = R.quotient(I)
sage: a^2
0
sage: 2*a
0
sage: S(2) + S(2)
0
```

So far, so good. Now, regarding your second issue, there is no problem that

```
sage: S(2) + S(3)
5
```

as this is correct. However, there seems to be a problem with the following:

```
sage: S(2) + S(3) == S(1)
False
```

Note that, however :

```
sage: S(2) + S(3) - S(1)
0
```

Perhaps should we investigate a bit further on where the problem is exactly and then report this as a ~~bug.~~

`confirmed_bug`

tag. In any case, thanks for reporting !

Copyright Sage, 2010. Some rights reserved under creative commons license. Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.