1 | initial version |

actually when you do `integrate(...)`

, Maxima is used: there is no such "Sage integrator". this correspond to what you observed.

the backend doing the symbolic integrator can be conveniently specified as the `algorithm`

keyword, as in `integrate(exp(arccos(x)),x,0,1, algorithm='giac')`

, etc.

there is a long collection of integrals that are wrong in the symbolics wiki. it should be checked if yours is reported there (i didn't check yet), and if it isn't then a new ticket should be created, possibly with an upstream report (Maxima).

2 | No.2 Revision |

actually when you do `integrate(...)`

, Maxima is used: there is no such "Sage integrator". this ~~correspond ~~corresponds to what you observed.

the backend doing the symbolic integrator can be conveniently specified as the `algorithm`

keyword, as in `integrate(exp(arccos(x)),x,0,1, algorithm='giac')`

, etc.

there is a long collection of integrals that are wrong in the symbolics wiki. it should be checked if yours is reported there (i didn't check yet), and if it isn't then a new ticket should be created, possibly with an upstream report (Maxima).

3 | No.3 Revision |

actually when you do `integrate(...)`

, Maxima is used: there is no such "Sage integrator". this corresponds to what you observed.

the backend doing the symbolic integrator can be conveniently specified ~~as ~~with the `algorithm`

keyword, as in `integrate(exp(arccos(x)),x,0,1, algorithm='giac')`

, etc.

there is a long collection of integrals that are wrong in the symbolics wiki. it should be checked if yours is reported there (i didn't check yet), and if it isn't then a new ticket should be created, possibly with an upstream report (Maxima).

4 | No.4 Revision |

actually when you do `integrate(...)`

, Maxima is used: there is no such "Sage integrator". this corresponds to what you observed.

the backend doing the symbolic integrator can be conveniently specified with the `algorithm`

keyword, as in `integrate(exp(arccos(x)),x,0,1, algorithm='giac')`

, etc.

there is a long collection of integrals that are wrong in the symbolics wiki. it should be checked if yours is reported there (i didn't check yet), and if it isn't then a new ticket ~~should ~~can be created, possibly with an upstream report (Maxima).

5 | No.5 Revision |

actually when you do `integrate(...)`

, Maxima is used: there is no such "Sage integrator". this corresponds to what you observed.

the backend doing the symbolic integrator can be conveniently specified with the `algorithm`

keyword, as in `integrate(exp(arccos(x)),x,0,1, algorithm='giac')`

, etc.

there is a ~~long ~~collection of integrals that are wrong in the symbolics wiki. it should be checked if yours is reported there (i didn't check yet), and if it isn't then a new ticket can be created, possibly with an upstream report (Maxima).

6 | No.6 Revision |

`integrate(...)`

, Maxima is used: there is no such "Sage integrator". this corresponds to what you observed.

the backend doing the symbolic integrator can be conveniently specified with the `algorithm`

keyword, as in `integrate(exp(arccos(x)),x,0,1, algorithm='giac')`

, etc.

there is a collection of integrals that are wrong in the symbolics wiki. it should be checked if yours is reported there (i didn't check yet), and if it isn't then a new ticket can be created, possibly with an upstream report (Maxima).

7 | No.7 Revision |

`integrate(...)`

, Maxima is used: there is no such "Sage integrator". this corresponds to what you observed.

`algorithm`

keyword, as in `integrate(exp(arccos(x)),x,0,1, algorithm='giac')`

, etc.

there is a collection of integrals that are wrong in the symbolics wiki. it should be checked if yours is reported there (i didn't check yet), and if it isn't then a new ticket can be created, possibly with an upstream report (Maxima).

EDIT: added ticket #24008.

thanks for reporting :)

8 | No.8 Revision |

`integrate(...)`

, Maxima is used: there is no such "Sage integrator". this corresponds to what you observed.

`algorithm`

keyword, as in `integrate(exp(arccos(x)),x,0,1, algorithm='giac')`

, etc.

there is a collection of integrals that are wrong in the symbolics wiki. it should be checked if yours is reported there (i didn't check yet), and if it isn't then a new ticket can be created, possibly with an upstream report (Maxima).

EDIT: added ticket #24008.

thanks for reporting :)

9 | No.9 Revision |

`integrate(...)`

, Maxima is used: there is no such "Sage integrator". this corresponds to what you observed.

`algorithm`

keyword, as in `integrate(exp(arccos(x)),x,0,1, algorithm='giac')`

, etc.

EDIT: i've added ticket #24008. thanks for reporting :)

Copyright Sage, 2010. Some rights reserved under creative commons license. Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.