Revision history [back]

Regarding your last question, ask.sagemath is not a bad place since quite a lot of developers are looking around, see the tags confirmed_bug and fixed_bug.

However, since you are able to add the feature yourself and since we need more developers, let me suggest you to:

• ask for an account on trac
• open a ticket
• make your changes on the source code (adding a method on src/sage/matrix/matrix_symbolic_dense.pyx following the existing simplify_full method)
• push your changes
• ask for a review

Regarding your last question, ask.sagemath is not a bad place since quite a lot of developers are looking around, see the tags confirmed_bug and fixed_bug.

However, since you are able to add the feature yourself and since we need more developers, let me suggest you to:

• ask for an account on trac
• open a ticket
• make your changes on the source code (adding a method on src/sage/matrix/matrix_symbolic_dense.pyx following the existing simplify_full method)
• push your changes
• ask for a review

Regarding your last question, ask.sagemath is not a bad place since quite a lot of developers are looking around, see the tags confirmed_bug and fixed_bug.

However, since you are able to add the feature yourself and since we need more developers, let me suggest you to:

• ask for an account on trac
• open a ticket
• make your changes on the source code (adding a method on src/sage/matrix/matrix_symbolic_dense.pyx following the existing simplify_full method)
• push your changes
• ask for a review

EDIT : during sage days 75, Fangan Dosso opened and filled trac ticket 21332 about that, so the feature will be available in the next versions of Sage.