# Revision history [back]

You could redefine the norm function in a subclass. Note that your e0 is an object of class Vector_rational_dense:

sage: V=VectorSpace(QQ,2,inner_product_matrix=SP)
sage: e0=V.0
sage: type(e0)
<type 'sage.modules.vector_rational_dense.Vector_rational_dense'>


So you can create a subclass, with a new norm function:

sage: from sage.modules.vector_rational_dense import Vector_rational_dense as Vrd
sage: class MyVector(Vrd):
....:     def norm(self):
....:         return self.inner_product(self)
....:


and write a helper function to take objects from the old class and make ones in the new class:

sage: def improve_norm(v):
....:     return MyVector(v.parent(),v.list())
....:


Here's how you could use it:

sage: f0 = improve_norm(e0)
sage: e0.norm()
1
sage: f0.norm()
2


Since MyVector is a subclass of Vector_rational_dense, the two should behave entirely the same, except for the new methods of MyVector:

sage: e0.parent() == f0.parent()
True
sage: e0 == f0
True


Be careful though; unless you do a bit more work, arithmetic with MyVector objects will produce Vector_rational_dense objects by default:

sage: type(f0)
<class '__main__.MyVector'>
sage: type(e0 + f0)
<type 'sage.modules.vector_rational_dense.Vector_rational_dense'>
sage: type(f0+f0)
<type 'sage.modules.vector_rational_dense.Vector_rational_dense'>
sage: type(3*f0)
<type 'sage.modules.vector_rational_dense.Vector_rational_dense'>


this is because the addition and multiplication methods are still those of Vector_rational_dense, which return an object of that type. If you want to fix this, you could also redefine _rmul_, _add_, etc.

You could redefine the norm function in a subclass. Note that your e0 is an object of class Vector_rational_dense:

sage: V=VectorSpace(QQ,2,inner_product_matrix=SP)
sage: e0=V.0
sage: type(e0)
<type 'sage.modules.vector_rational_dense.Vector_rational_dense'>


So you can create a subclass, with a new norm function:

sage: from sage.modules.vector_rational_dense import Vector_rational_dense as Vrd
sage: class MyVector(Vrd):
....:     def norm(self):
....:         return self.inner_product(self)
sqrt(self.inner_product(self))
....:


and write a helper function to take objects from the old class and make ones in the new class:

sage: def improve_norm(v):
....:     return MyVector(v.parent(),v.list())
....:


Here's how you could use it:

sage: f0 = improve_norm(e0)
sage: e0.norm()
1
sage: f0.norm()
2
sqrt(2)


Since MyVector is a subclass of Vector_rational_dense, the two should behave entirely the same, except for the new methods of MyVector:

sage: e0.parent() == f0.parent()
True
sage: e0 == f0
True


Be careful though; unless you do a bit more work, arithmetic with MyVector objects will produce Vector_rational_dense objects by default:

sage: type(f0)
<class '__main__.MyVector'>
sage: type(e0 + f0)
<type 'sage.modules.vector_rational_dense.Vector_rational_dense'>
sage: type(f0+f0)
<type 'sage.modules.vector_rational_dense.Vector_rational_dense'>
sage: type(3*f0)
<type 'sage.modules.vector_rational_dense.Vector_rational_dense'>


this is because the addition and multiplication methods are still those of Vector_rational_dense, which return an object of that type. If you want to fix this, you could also redefine _rmul_, _add_, etc.