1 | initial version |

gaussian_binomial is faster, for one:

```
sage: %timeit a=q_analogues.q_binomial(20,10)
25 loops, best of 3: 8.45 ms per loop
sage: %timeit a=gaussian_binomial(20,10)
625 loops, best of 3: 1.52 ms per loop
```

Looking at the code makes me think that gaussian_binomial is strictly better than q_binomial, and the latter should be made an alias for the former. But perhaps I'm missing something.

2 | No.2 Revision |

gaussian_binomial is faster, for one:

```
sage: %timeit a=q_analogues.q_binomial(20,10)
25 loops, best of 3: 8.45 ms per loop
sage: %timeit a=gaussian_binomial(20,10)
625 loops, best of 3: 1.52 ms per loop
```

Looking at the code makes me think that ~~gaussian_binomial ~~`gaussian_binomial`

is strictly better than ~~q_binomial, ~~`q_binomial`

, and the latter should be made an alias for the former. But perhaps I'm missing something.

Copyright Sage, 2010. Some rights reserved under creative commons license. Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.