2023-08-07 03:01:46 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2023-08-07 03:01:01 +0200 | asked a question | .is_isomorphic() does not work .is_isomorphic() does not work e = [(3, 4, 5), (5, 6, 7), (7, 8, 1), (1, 3, 6), (1, 4, 7), (3, 5, 8), (1, 3, 6), (4, 6, |
2023-06-09 04:35:37 +0200 | marked best answer | Using lagrange_polynomial() on points with variable coefficients Is it possible to modify lagrange_polynomial so that it accepts points with variable entries? I was able to make it work on a small example, by disabling the coercion functions in the source file "polynomial_ring.py", but then the program failed on a finite field. returns: TypeError: unable to convert y to a rational |
2023-06-07 13:07:58 +0200 | edited question | Using lagrange_polynomial() on points with variable coefficients Using lagrange_polynomial() on points with variable coefficients Is it possible to modify lagrange_polynomial so that it |
2023-06-07 12:57:21 +0200 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2023-06-07 12:57:21 +0200 | edited question | Using lagrange_polynomial() on points with variable coefficients Using lagrange_polynomial() on points with variable coefficients Is it possible to modify lagrange_polynomial so that it |
2023-06-07 02:38:36 +0200 | asked a question | Using lagrange_polynomial() on points with variable coefficients Using lagrange_polynomial() on points with variable coefficients Is it possible to modify lagrange_polynomial so that it |
2023-05-17 00:34:39 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2023-01-13 02:15:12 +0200 | asked a question | Why are the binary trees immutable? Why are the binary trees immutable? The class BinaryTree is immutable. Is there an advantage to this? |
2022-04-16 05:53:50 +0200 | marked best answer | Two polynomials multiply incorrectly only on my computer I am using Docker Desktop on Windows 11 to run Sagemath with Macaulay package. The polynomials "F[0]" and "xd" below multiply into "dat" incorrectly (when compared to the correct result on another computer.) I tried to obtain a minimal example illustrating my problem: Source Code This program works fine on another computer. The result I get on my computer has a summand "-alpha_01^6x_1^11x_2^3". In a correct expansion of "dat", the summand "...+ -alpha_01^6x_1^11x_2^3+..." must not appear. Note: I tried using polynomial rings instead of symbolic variables, but differentiation operation is not defined for polynomial rings. |
2022-04-16 05:08:02 +0200 | commented question | Two polynomials multiply incorrectly only on my computer As you recommended, I started with rational functions, and using derivatives and determinants that are already defined, |
2022-04-16 04:59:32 +0200 | commented question | Two polynomials multiply incorrectly only on my computer As you recommended, I started with rational functions, and using derivatives and determinants that are already defined, |
2022-04-12 22:15:27 +0200 | received badge | ● Organizer (source) |
2022-04-12 22:13:02 +0200 | asked a question | Two polynomials multiply incorrectly only on my computer Two polynomials multiply incorrectly only on my computer I am using Docker Desktop on Windows 11 to run Sagemath with Ma |
2022-04-08 03:56:55 +0200 | asked a question | Two polynomials multiply incorrectly Two polynomials multiply incorrectly I am using Docker Desktop on Windows 11 to run Sagemath with Macaulay package. The |
2022-03-21 00:35:50 +0200 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2022-02-04 00:33:35 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2022-02-02 22:56:22 +0200 | marked best answer | Infinitely many variables Is there a way to define infinitely many variables? At the moment, I am able to define arbitrarily big number of symbolic variables, x[i], using a code as follows: I would like to be able to define x_i for i=1,2,... Is this possible using the symbolic ring? |
2022-02-02 22:56:22 +0200 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2022-02-02 22:39:56 +0200 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2022-02-02 22:34:46 +0200 | asked a question | Infinitely many variables Infinitely many variables Is there a way to define infinitely many variables? At the moment, I am able to define arbitr |