2023-08-13 01:33:38 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2023-08-02 18:57:38 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2023-07-13 03:28:12 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2023-07-09 13:03:53 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2023-06-03 06:54:29 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2023-05-19 14:27:03 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2022-12-30 11:14:44 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2021-06-04 04:25:05 +0200 | commented answer | Plot with no scale on the y axis Thank you, this totally solves my problem! |
2021-06-04 04:24:42 +0200 | marked best answer | Plot with no scale on the y axis If I plot a function that generates huge numbers, then sage normalizes it between -1 and 1. I don't like this behaviour because it hides the real values on the y scale. For example, if I do what I get is a plot between -1 and 1 on both the axis. Is there a way to have the values on the y axis with the right scale? |
2021-06-04 04:24:42 +0200 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2021-06-04 02:21:11 +0200 | asked a question | Plot with no scale on the y axis Plot with no scale on the y axis If I plot a function that generates huge numbers, then sage normalizes it between -1 an |
2021-04-18 14:51:22 +0200 | answered a question | Running a for cycle in parallel It would have been better if you specified how you used @parallel and what do you exactly mean when you say " it doesn't |
2021-04-14 00:23:36 +0200 | commented question | Pickling fast_callable wrappers I have seen that there is a question that is somehow related to mine: http://ask.sagemath.org/question/9831/saving-compi |
2021-04-13 22:39:11 +0200 | asked a question | Pickling fast_callable wrappers Pickling fast_callable wrappers I am trying to parallelize a code that must evaluate a specific function on several diff |
2021-03-06 23:30:49 +0200 | commented question | Why is PolynomialRing over SR much slower than SR? Sorry, I should have added a snippet to show the behaviour. Now I have added it to my question. |
2021-03-06 23:30:02 +0200 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2021-03-06 23:30:02 +0200 | edited question | Why is PolynomialRing over SR much slower than SR? Why is PolynomialRing over SR much slower than SR? In my code, I was trying to invert a matrix whose entries are symboli |
2021-03-06 10:30:37 +0200 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2021-03-05 23:19:14 +0200 | asked a question | Why is PolynomialRing over SR much slower than SR? Why is PolynomialRing over SR much slower than SR? In my code, I was trying to invert a matrix whose entries are symboli |