2020-05-01 08:49:47 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2018-02-16 12:41:46 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2016-01-18 16:45:56 +0200 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2015-11-30 23:13:02 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2015-05-06 23:56:40 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2014-06-25 11:10:16 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2014-05-20 09:35:26 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2013-11-20 22:24:44 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2013-06-23 12:12:45 +0200 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2013-06-21 18:06:50 +0200 | asked a question | solve system of non-linear implicit equations numerically I am attempting to solve for a solution of a system of two non-linear implicit equations using the following code: Everything runs, up to the point of the solve function, which continues to run for what appears to be indefinitely. The code show(g1 + g2) shows a graph that clearly shows there exists an intersection for both curves. I tried to use to_poly_solve=True without success. I do not mind an approximate solution, however I was unable to find a numeric solver for a system such as this (find_root afaik only works on one variable) that will work. Does there exist a numeric solver which is capable of solving a system of this form? What other alternatives are there? Thanks, menturi |
2012-11-21 20:06:03 +0200 | asked a question | Unit conversion I'm not certain if the behaviour is correct in this example, or I am possibly misunderstanding something. Sorry about the lengthy example, but I had difficulties simplifying it into a simpler one. Running the code, the section labelled What concerns me is my calculator (TI-92+) has conversion difficulties with this unit as well, being unable to convert. Is this the expected/normal/ideal behaviour for sage? If so, for what reason(s)? If not, what should I do? Thank you, menturi |