 | 1 | initial version |
Sage can convert huge integer number into string very quickly but the opposite way it is very slow:
n=2^7000000; s=str(n); (very fast) m=int(s); (very slow)
I also used "eval" and "sage_eval" instead of "int" with same result, i.e. converting from huge string into integer number is very slow. It should take about same time in both cases since variables n, m and s are of the same length.
Do you have any idea why is this so? Mathematica is much more faster in evaluating the above operations.
| | 2 | retagged |
Sage can convert huge integer number into string very quickly but the opposite way it is very slow:
n=2^7000000; s=str(n); (very fast) m=int(s); (very slow)
I also used "eval" and "sage_eval" instead of "int" with same result, i.e. converting from huge string into integer number is very slow. It should take about same time in both cases since variables n, m and s are of the same length.
Do you have any idea why is this so? Mathematica is much more faster in evaluating the above operations.
Copyright Sage, 2010. Some rights reserved under creative commons license. Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.
