Ask Your Question

Revision history [back]

click to hide/show revision 1
initial version

solving for a formula rather than a variable in sage

Right now im trying to solve one of the problems i've encountered using sage and it seems like im onto something. However I've encountered a kink at step3 in my code.

x1, x2, l, p1, p2, a, b,  R= var('x1, x2, l, p1, p2, a, b,  R')
U = x1^a*x2^b
m = p1*x1+p2*x2;
L = m+ l * (R-U);
dLdx = L.diff(x1);
dLdy = L.diff(x2);    
dLdl = L.diff(l);
step1=solve([dLdx == 0, dLdy == 0, dLdl == 0], p1, p2, R)
step2=solve(step1[0][0].rhs()/step1[0][1].rhs()==p1/p2,x1)
step3=solve(U.subs(step2)==R,x2)
step3

Out: x2^b == R/(a*p2*x2/(b*p1))^a

being that I want to isolate x2 im not sure why its power b is not just moved over.

why is this the case?

solving for a formula rather than a variable in sage

Right now im trying to solve one of the problems i've encountered using sage and it seems like im onto something. However I've encountered a kink at step3 in my code.

x1, x2, l, p1, p2, a, b,  R= var('x1, x2, l, p1, p2, a, b,  R')
U = x1^a*x2^b
m = p1*x1+p2*x2;
L = m+ l * (R-U);
dLdx = L.diff(x1);
dLdy = L.diff(x2);    
dLdl = L.diff(l);
step1=solve([dLdx == 0, dLdy == 0, dLdl == 0], p1, p2, R)
step2=solve(step1[0][0].rhs()/step1[0][1].rhs()==p1/p2,x1)
step3=solve(U.subs(step2)==R,x2)
step3

Out: x2^b == R/(a*p2*x2/(b*p1))^a

being that I want to isolate x2 im not sure why its power b is not just moved over.

why is this the case?

solving for a formula rather than a variable in sage

Right now im trying to solve one of the problems i've encountered using sage and it seems like im onto something. However I've encountered a kink at step3 in my code.

x1, x2, l, p1, p2, a, b,  R= var('x1, x2, l, p1, p2, a, b,  R')
U = x1^a*x2^b
m = p1*x1+p2*x2;
L = m+ l * (R-U);
dLdx = L.diff(x1);
dLdy = L.diff(x2);    
dLdl = L.diff(l);
step1=solve([dLdx == 0, dLdy == 0, dLdl == 0], p1, p2, R)
step2=solve(step1[0][0].rhs()/step1[0][1].rhs()==p1/p2,x1)
step3=solve(U.subs(step2)==R,x2)
step3

Out: x2^b == R/(a*p2*x2/(b*p1))^a

being that I want to isolate x2 im not sure why its power b is not just moved over.

why is this the case?

solving for a formula rather than a variable in sage

Right now im trying to solve one of the problems i've encountered using sage and it seems like im onto something. However I've encountered a kink at step3 in my code.

x1, x2, l, p1, p2, a, b,  R= var('x1, x2, l, p1, p2, a, b,  R')
U = x1^a*x2^b
m = p1*x1+p2*x2;
L = m+ l * (R-U);
dLdx = L.diff(x1);
dLdy = L.diff(x2);    
dLdl = L.diff(l);
step1=solve([dLdx == 0, dLdy == 0, dLdl == 0], p1, p2, R)
step2=solve(step1[0][0].rhs()/step1[0][1].rhs()==p1/p2,x1)
step3=solve(U.subs(step2)==R,x2)
step3

Out: x2^b == R/(a*p2*x2/(b*p1))^a

being that I want to isolate x2 im not sure why its power b is not just moved over.

why is this the case?

solving for a formula rather than a variable in sage

Right now im trying to solve one of the problems i've encountered using sage and it seems like im onto something. However I've encountered a kink at step3 in my code.

x1, x2, l, p1, p2, a, b,  R= var('x1, x2, l, p1, p2, a, b,  R')
U = x1^a*x2^b
m = p1*x1+p2*x2;
L = m+ l * (R-U);
dLdx = L.diff(x1);
dLdy = L.diff(x2);    
dLdl = L.diff(l);
step1=solve([dLdx == 0, dLdy == 0, dLdl == 0], p1, p2, R)
step2=solve(step1[0][0].rhs()/step1[0][1].rhs()==p1/p2,x1)
step3=solve(U.subs(step2)==R,x2)
step3

Out: x2^b == R/(a*p2*x2/(b*p1))^a

being that I want to isolate x2 im not sure why its power b is not just moved over.

why is this the case?

solving for a formula rather than a variable in sageIncomplete solutions

Right now im trying to solve one of the problems i've encountered using sage and it seems like im onto something. However I've encountered a kink at step3 in my code.

x1, x2, l, p1, p2, a, b,  R= var('x1, x2, l, p1, p2, a, b,  R')
U = x1^a*x2^b
m = p1*x1+p2*x2;
L = m+ l * (R-U);
dLdx = L.diff(x1);
dLdy = L.diff(x2);    
dLdl = L.diff(l);
step1=solve([dLdx == 0, dLdy == 0, dLdl == 0], p1, p2, R)
step2=solve(step1[0][0].rhs()/step1[0][1].rhs()==p1/p2,x1)
step3=solve(U.subs(step2)==R,x2)
step3

Out: x2^b == R/(a*p2*x2/(b*p1))^a

being that I want to isolate x2 im not sure why its power b is not just moved over.

why is this the case?


Note: The following code works

x1, x2, l, p1, p2, a, b,  Ubar= var('x1, x2, l, p1, p2, a, b,  Ubar')
assume(x1>0,x2>0,a>0,b>0)
U = x1*x2
m = p1*x1+p2*x2;
L = m+ l * (Ubar-U);
dLdx = L.diff(x1);
dLdy = L.diff(x2);
dLdl = L.diff(l);
step1=solve([dLdx == 0, dLdy == 0, dLdl == 0], p1, p2, Ubar)
step2=solve(step1[0][0].rhs()/step1[0][1].rhs()==p1/p2,x1)
step3good2=solve(U.subs(step2)==Ubar,x2)
step4good1=solve(step2[0].subs(step3Good2),x1)

step3good2

Out: [x2 == sqrt(R*p1/p2)]

step4good1

Out: [x1 == sqrt(R*p1/p2)*p2/p1]

This works because I'm considering a case where our utility function has no exponents a and b. What am I missing from my code?

Incomplete solutions

Right now im trying to solve one of the problems i've encountered using sage and it seems like im onto something. However I've encountered a kink at step3 in my code.

x1, x2, l, p1, p2, a, b,  R= var('x1, x2, l, p1, p2, a, b,  R')
U = x1^a*x2^b
m = p1*x1+p2*x2;
L = m+ l * (R-U);
dLdx = L.diff(x1);
dLdy = L.diff(x2);    
dLdl = L.diff(l);
step1=solve([dLdx == 0, dLdy == 0, dLdl == 0], p1, p2, R)
step2=solve(step1[0][0].rhs()/step1[0][1].rhs()==p1/p2,x1)
step3=solve(U.subs(step2)==R,x2)
step3

Out: x2^b == R/(a*p2*x2/(b*p1))^a

being that I want to isolate x2 im not sure why its power b is not just moved over.

why is this the case?


Note: The following code works

x1, x2, l, p1, p2, a, b,  Ubar= var('x1, x2, l, p1, p2, a, b,  Ubar')
assume(x1>0,x2>0,a>0,b>0)
U = x1*x2
m = p1*x1+p2*x2;
L = m+ l * (Ubar-U);
dLdx = L.diff(x1);
dLdy = L.diff(x2);
dLdl = L.diff(l);
step1=solve([dLdx == 0, dLdy == 0, dLdl == 0], p1, p2, Ubar)
step2=solve(step1[0][0].rhs()/step1[0][1].rhs()==p1/p2,x1)
step3good2=solve(U.subs(step2)==Ubar,x2)
step4good1=solve(step2[0].subs(step3Good2),x1)

step3good2

Out: [x2 == sqrt(R*p1/p2)]

step4good1

Out: [x1 == sqrt(R*p1/p2)*p2/p1]

This works because I'm considering a case where our utility function has no exponents a and b. What am I missing from my code?