2021-07-13 16:56:13 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2020-09-22 14:31:24 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2012-06-02 14:21:13 +0200 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2012-06-02 02:07:22 +0200 | commented question | Working with series yes, generally Puiseux series would be better, but sin t is to return Taylor expansion around zero if it doesn't specified in it's type directly. |
2012-06-01 16:07:02 +0200 | asked a question | Working with series I can't get how to work with series. I do but the last rises an error. I want to do usual manipulations like |
2012-06-01 15:39:47 +0200 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2012-06-01 15:39:47 +0200 | marked best answer | Output Types in Shell You can use the |
2012-05-29 14:15:00 +0200 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2012-05-29 07:33:20 +0200 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2012-05-29 07:30:57 +0200 | asked a question | Output Types in Shell Does sage use essentially typeless language? If no, is there a way to output type in the shell, preferably always along with the answer. Just like Axiom does it: Fore some reason unicode doesn't display here. |