20200413 08:25:34 +0100  received badge  ● Notable Question (source) 
20181114 11:43:27 +0100  received badge  ● Famous Question (source) 
20181114 11:43:27 +0100  received badge  ● Notable Question (source) 
20181003 20:08:56 +0100  received badge  ● Popular Question (source) 
20181003 20:08:56 +0100  received badge  ● Notable Question (source) 
20180522 05:02:00 +0100  received badge  ● Notable Question (source) 
20171209 08:09:41 +0100  received badge  ● Famous Question (source) 
20170622 15:57:07 +0100  received badge  ● Taxonomist 
20170313 15:26:44 +0100  received badge  ● Popular Question (source) 
20161127 02:16:45 +0100  received badge  ● Popular Question (source) 
20160520 14:38:28 +0100  received badge  ● Notable Question (source) 
20151231 05:01:46 +0100  received badge  ● Popular Question (source) 
20151030 11:36:48 +0100  received badge  ● Popular Question (source) 
20120812 14:07:08 +0100  answered a question  invoke external program I apologize to everyone for my inconvenience. The heart of problem was my making of a rookie mistake. When creating TeX file, I didn't close the file properly. Namely, instead of I typed Without brackets, the final 
20120812 14:01:48 +0100  commented question  invoke external program Yes, right, it is. I've already found out the cause of problem  I'm gonna write the solution in a few minutes... 
20120812 11:50:09 +0100  received badge  ● Editor (source) 
20120810 16:10:26 +0100  asked a question  invoke external program What is the proper way to call external applications in my programs? Specifically, pdfLaTeX compiler. When I invoke Am I missing something or why doesn't this work? P. S. My original post may have been confusing. When I wrote:
I meant embedding into "my_code.sage" source code, which is consequently attached and run in Sage's CLI. P. P. S. When use it in my "foo.sage" code as below: following log is produced: However, written explicitly in Sage's console and even in bash console, everything compiles correctly. Does this mean something? Just FYI, I did end my source file with 
20120721 06:36:59 +0100  commented question  compile TeX from Sage Hmm, that sounds interesting  you mean like splitting up computational and presentation part and make a *template* in (Sage)TeX with desired format? I'm just a little bit afraid if SageTeX is powerful enough. Specifically can I typeset sth conditionally (like `if` command)? Some properties of the function (*even, constant, periodic*...) would be nice to omit when they're N/A to show... 
20120720 15:31:04 +0100  commented question  compile TeX from Sage Yes, sth exactly like that. My task is to do some basic investigations about a given realvalued function (stationary/inflection points, intervals of monotonicity, asymptotes...) a and give out a nice dvi/pdf. Because of computational part it should stay in Sage/python code. Maybe the SageTeX is the solution (I haven't got into its depts yet)  some way to compile SageTeX's source file from Sage's command line (so that I could call it in my program)? 
20120720 14:50:57 +0100  commented question  compile TeX from Sage I know what you mean & I did think about this way for quite a long time. But the truth is this my college project  which should be own Sage/Python library, not TeX project. Or maybe I just misunderstood the idea around SageTeX & it can processed via Python/Sage  is it somehow *"doable"*? 
20120720 09:04:46 +0100  marked best answer  convert expression to function Does it answer the question ? 
20120720 09:03:01 +0100  marked best answer  convert expression to function No deprecation warning! What's going on here is that which is what you want, as opposed to in your first attempt, which is perhaps ambiguous. 
20120720 09:01:45 +0100  received badge  ● Organizer (source) 
20120720 09:00:23 +0100  asked a question  compile TeX from Sage Hola! I'm working on a program which should output the results of its computations in form of a typesetted document (ideally pdf from pdflatex). I'm trying to perfrom the final presentation part via I'm pondering about generating an explicit ThanX in advance! Sage 5.1 Kubuntu 12.04 
20120718 11:01:29 +0100  marked best answer  Existence of a limit Hi as far as I understand the problem is that oo so on are symbolic expressios. If you try to compare them with == sage returns as a new symbolic expression the symbolic equationion: returns A soultion seems to be to cast the symbolic equation to a boolean: which returns 
20120718 11:01:29 +0100  received badge  ● Scholar (source) 
20120718 11:01:12 +0100  commented answer  Existence of a limit ThanX, the `SR('ind')` *hack* solved my problem :) 
20120718 11:00:09 +0100  answered a question  Existence of a limit ThanX, the SR('ind') "hack" solved my problem :) 
20120718 10:06:14 +0100  commented answer  Existence of a limit Unfortunately, `ind` is unknown to sage for some reason: sage: bool( lim(sin(x), x=oo) == ind)  NameError Traceback (most recent call last) NameError: name 'ind' is not defined 
20120718 07:04:23 +0100  asked a question  Existence of a limit How does one (i.e. automatically in an own program) recognize existence of a limit? So far I've discovered that oo, oo, ind, und cause the nonexistence, I just dunno how to test these "values". Obvious does not work... Sage 5.1 Kubuntu 12.04 
20120607 13:36:23 +0100  asked a question  Typesetting text in TeX view() Is there a standard way to typeset TeX formulas together with normal text via view()? So far I've been using where 
20120531 18:59:00 +0100  commented answer  convert expression to function Great, sounds perfect!! Any way to do this without knowledge of expression's default variable? Say, if I get only the "s", can I do a makeover to function in a universal way? 
20120520 17:47:09 +0100  received badge  ● Supporter (source) 
20120520 17:47:03 +0100  commented answer  convert expression to function Still giving out same DeprecationWarning but seems to be proper method... 
20120520 09:55:47 +0100  received badge  ● Student (source) 
20120520 06:52:44 +0100  asked a question  convert expression to function Hola, is there a way to convert symbolic expression to proper functions? E. g. So far I've been using f(x) = s(x), however, deprection warnings occur:
