2019-12-10 01:40:34 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2018-05-19 18:29:56 +0100 | commented question | Solving ODE using desolve_rk4 but th I'm not new to Sage but since I don't use it a lot I'm kinda an inexperienced user. But what I would do (whether on Sage or any other numerical package) is to find Temp(t), that is, find Temp as a function of 't' given the 't' and 'Temp' points you supplied as lists. I plotted your points and they represent a broken sinusoidal line, but there may be ways to find a reasonable expression for Temp(t). Then you would substitute Temp(t) in your code by the expression you found. |
2018-05-19 17:45:50 +0100 | commented answer | Unexpected behaviour of arbitrary precision real numbers That worked, thanks! I was suspecting that the formatted print command should be blamed for that. Yet, the following two lines work nicely on Sage's notebook, too: and repr() seems not to be necessary in this case. Too much to learn. :-) |
2018-05-19 17:37:30 +0100 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2018-05-19 05:06:46 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2018-05-19 02:29:08 +0100 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2018-05-19 02:26:56 +0100 | asked a question | Unexpected behaviour of arbitrary precision real numbers I've been trying to use arbitrary precision real numbers and I'm a bit confused. The simple snippet below illustrates my point: I should get (or that's what I was expecting) 1.41421356237309504880, but instead I got 1.41421356237309514547 (a disagreement in the last five decimal places). Where am I goofing up? You see, it's a quite simple code. How could I fix it in order to obtain the desired/expected result? Thanks in advance for any light shed on this matter. Fausto |
2015-02-05 09:10:35 +0100 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2015-02-05 09:10:33 +0100 | received badge | ● Self-Learner (source) |
2015-02-05 09:10:33 +0100 | received badge | ● Teacher (source) |
2015-02-05 08:42:31 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2015-02-03 02:42:15 +0100 | answered a question | list_plot() not working in a terminal session I found the solution for this problem. All I had to do was to replace the following line: list_plot(...) by the following two lines: p = list_plot(...) p.show() And then a plot was plotted. |
2015-02-02 23:52:28 +0100 | commented question | Solving PDEs Hello, I assume you want to have your PDE(s) solved numerically. And I don't think SAGE is the best tool to accomplish that. You can certainly solve your PDE with SAGE, but you will have to put a lot of your own code together. If you want to solve equations like the above with less effort, may I suggest you to use FiPy, a PDE solver that uses the finite volume method (FVM). It has extensive documentation, several examples and a support list where developers and users will help you with your questions. Good luck! Fausto |
2015-02-02 15:09:27 +0100 | asked a question | list_plot() not working in a terminal session Hello, list_plot() does not produce any plot when I run a script in a terminal (pure text) session. But it does when I run the same script in SAGE's graphical ("notebook()") environment. However, in both ways the execution ends normally (no error messages). Curiously, if I type list_plot(...array name goes here...) in the terminal after the execution of the aforementioned script, a plot is produced. Any explanation for that? The script is quite simple and short as shown below. Thanks for any help. |