2016-06-17 10:03:41 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |

2015-12-14 18:02:24 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |

2015-10-26 07:05:37 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |

2014-12-02 11:09:13 +0200 | received badge | ● Teacher (source) |

2014-12-02 11:09:13 +0200 | received badge | ● Self-Learner (source) |

2014-12-02 07:09:45 +0200 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |

2014-12-02 07:09:22 +0200 | commented answer | Declaring variable to be in a particular field/ring/group Some more head-smacking revealed I can take a quotient to get what I wanted; see my self-answer above. Thanks again for your feedback! |

2014-12-02 07:07:43 +0200 | answered a question | Declaring variable to be in a particular field/ring/group I think I found a workaround: make x not be the variable of the polynomial ring but rather that of the quotient of that ring by the ideal generated by z^2-z. In other words: var('X'); x=PolynomialRing(Integers(3), 'X').quotient([X^2-1], 'x').gens()[0] print x^3==x and x^2==1 and 3*x==0 evals to True |

2014-12-01 18:52:34 +0200 | received badge | ● Student (source) |

2014-11-30 00:32:26 +0200 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |

2014-11-30 00:32:24 +0200 | commented answer | Declaring variable to be in a particular field/ring/group Thanks for your answer. I guess there are two issues here: 1) the feature request you point out as #9935 to make mod work with symbolic expressions; and 2) that sage should know that PolynomialRing(Integers(3)) doesn't need to track powers higher than 2 (and generally that PR(I(p)) doesn't need to track powers higher than p-1). Is that natural fallout from #9935 or do you think that deserves its own feature request? At any rate, it seems the short answer to my original question is "it's not possible (yet)". Unless you can think of a workaround? |

2014-11-28 17:44:44 +0200 | asked a question | Declaring variable to be in a particular field/ring/group Is it possible to have Sage symbolically simplify expressions involving variables subject to the assumption that the variables take values in a defined domain (field/ring/group/etc)? The closest I've gotten is to declare a dummy polynomial ring over my domain of interest so that its variable has some notion of the domain, e.g.: Z3=Integers(3) Dummy.<x> = PolynomialRing(Z3) 3*x evaluates to "0" as I'd expect, but sage fails to simplify "x^3" to "x", which ISTM should be doable if it really understood that x is a variable in Z/3Z. Related things I've found in my searches that haven't panned out: |

Copyright Sage, 2010. Some rights reserved under creative commons license. Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.