2019-11-21 13:41:43 +0200 | received badge | ● Taxonomist |
2015-01-13 22:19:42 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2014-06-29 21:01:15 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2014-06-29 21:01:15 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2013-02-20 15:37:42 +0200 | received badge | ● Good Answer (source) |
2012-12-04 12:55:26 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Answer (source) |
2012-09-23 04:40:48 +0200 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2012-09-01 15:31:27 +0200 | received badge | ● Necromancer (source) |
2012-09-01 15:31:27 +0200 | received badge | ● Teacher (source) |
2012-08-26 16:55:25 +0200 | asked a question | Discrepancy between Graph.modular_decomposition() and Wikipedia I am either confused, or am seeing a bug, or there's a bug on Wikipedia. There's a diagram on the page about modular decomposition referenced by the docs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modular_... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mod... It shows a 'series' module containing 2,3,4. But when I recreate that graph and run modular_decomposition() on it I get something that seems different: W = Graph() W.add_edges([[1,2],[1,4],[1,3],[2,4],[2,5],[2,6],[2,7],[3,4],[3,5],[3,6],[3,7],[4,5],[4,6],[4,7],[5,6],[5,7],[6,8],[6,9],[6,10],[6,11],[7,8],[7,9],[7,10],[7,11],[8,9],[8,10],[8,11],[9,10],[9,11]]) W.plot(vertex_size=100) W.modular_decomposition() results in ('Prime', [ ('Serie', [ ('Parallel', [ 10, 11 ] ), 9, 8 ] ), ('Parallel', [ 6, 7 ] ), 5, 1, 4, ('Parallel', [ 2, 3 ] ) ] ) Which shows 8,9,10,11 in a 'series' but not 2,3,4. Am I getting something wrong or missing something? |
2012-03-13 15:05:15 +0200 | answered a question | How do I display the full output that includes graphics? I found this solves the problem: put this line in your notebook cell before you create output. Worked for me. |