2020-12-22 23:43:19 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2020-12-22 23:43:19 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2016-12-12 15:03:39 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2014-02-18 17:49:58 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2014-02-05 11:22:37 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2014-02-05 07:02:57 +0200 | asked a question | build sage without documentation I see that sometimes when building sage with the commands the majority of time is employed in building the documentation. Actually I'm not interested in building the documentation on my machine (I usually have an internet connection and I usually browse the documentation online). Is it possible to ignore the documentation when building sage? How can I do that? |
2013-07-30 11:55:28 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2013-01-10 05:04:46 +0200 | commented question | calling mathematica 9.0 in sage A ticket has been opened here http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13892 |
2012-09-06 13:23:50 +0200 | commented question | Caching sagetex results Thanks, I'll try. I visited the link you indicated but it's not immediate for me to understand how to open an issue. As soon I have more time I'll definitely try! |
2012-08-20 13:34:22 +0200 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2012-08-20 13:33:30 +0200 | asked a question | Caching sagetex results Is there a way to cache computations already done in a latex file using sagetex so that, for example, if I add a Sage code line in The best thing would be that when one uses sagetex, Sage remembers what formulas are already computed and stored in foo.sout, and recomputes them only when they are modified. Do you think it's possible? Thanks! |
2012-08-10 14:36:01 +0200 | marked best answer | flask notebook Here are a few:
|
2012-08-10 14:36:01 +0200 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2012-07-31 06:31:36 +0200 | asked a question | flask notebook What are the major advantages of the migration to the flask notebook? |
2012-03-18 13:48:40 +0200 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2012-03-09 10:53:51 +0200 | received badge | ● Teacher (source) |
2012-03-09 10:53:51 +0200 | received badge | ● Self-Learner (source) |
2012-03-09 10:48:57 +0200 | answered a question | 3d plot ignoring imaginary part I just get to a solution by myself... My problem was the impossibility to plot because of numerical errors that turns my (expected) real values into complex numbers with an imaginary part extremely small. I used the fantastic function "list_plot3d". For example: It's not difficult to modify the above code if one wants to really ignore complex numbers while plotting (that is indeed what Matlab automatically does). |
2012-03-07 16:14:27 +0200 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2012-03-07 12:33:08 +0200 | asked a question | 3d plot ignoring imaginary part Is there any possibility to have a 3d plot done in a way that if the expression to be plotted returns a complex number, this is not plotted. In particular I'm referring to this feature in Matlab: when you try to plot in 3d an expression which in his domain has both real and complex values, it returns the plot only when the values are real. In addition Matlab prints a Warning: "Imaginary parts of complex X, Y, and/or Z arguments ignored". Thanks! (tell me if it's not clear, I'll explain better...) |