2022-03-31 08:01:20 +0200 | commented answer | Plotting Zero-free regions You can play around with aspect_ratio. I have updated the answer accordingly. If it solves the original question, you c |

2022-03-31 07:59:46 +0200 | commented answer | Plotting Zero-free regions You can play around with aspect_ratio. I have updated the answer accordingly. |

2022-03-31 07:58:24 +0200 | edited answer | Plotting Zero-free regions Maybe something like var('sigma,t') c=0.3 region_plot((1-sigma)-c/log(2+abs(t))<= 0, (sigma, 0, 1), (t, -100, 100), |

2022-03-29 13:17:35 +0200 | received badge | ● Teacher (source) |

2022-03-29 11:13:38 +0200 | edited answer | Plotting Zero-free regions Maybe something like var('sigma,t') c=0.3 region_plot((1-sigma)-c/log(2+abs(t))<= 0, (sigma, 0, 1), (t, -2, 2)) w |

2022-03-29 11:12:52 +0200 | edited answer | Plotting Zero-free regions Maybe something like var('sigma,t') c=0.3 region_plot((1-sigma)-c/log(2+abs(t))<= 0, (sigma, 0, 1), (t, -2, 2)) w |

2022-03-29 11:12:21 +0200 | edited answer | Plotting Zero-free regions Maybe something like var('sigma,t') c=0.3 region_plot((1-sigma)-c/log(2+abs(t))<= 0, (sigma, 0, 1), (t, -2, 2)) w |

2022-03-29 11:08:28 +0200 | edited answer | Plotting Zero-free regions Maybe something like var('sigma,t') c=0.3 region_plot((1-sigma)-c/log(2+abs(t))<= 0, (sigma, -1, 1), (t, -2, 2)) |

2022-03-29 11:07:13 +0200 | edited answer | Plotting Zero-free regions Maybe something like var('sigma,t') c=0.3 region_plot((1-sigma)-c/log(2+abs(t))<= 0, (sigma, -1, 1), (t, -2, 2),asp |

2022-03-29 11:06:49 +0200 | answered a question | Plotting Zero-free regions Maybe something like var('sigma,t') c=0.3 region_plot((1-sigma)-c/log(2+abs(t))<= 0, (sigma, -1, 1), (t, -2, 2),asp |

2022-03-27 13:15:24 +0200 | commented answer | Fix a number field embedding for a newform for $\Gamma_0(N)$ Done!. Thanks again! |

2022-03-27 13:14:53 +0200 | marked best answer | Fix a number field embedding for a newform for $\Gamma_0(N)$ I am trying to do some numerics with newforms for $\Gamma_0(N)$. E.g gives me (an approximation) of the chosen newform at $10i/2\pi\in \mathbb H$. The chosen newform has coefficients in $\mathbb Q$ If instead I choose another newform which has coefficients in the number field with defining polynomial $x^2 - 767888x - 9686519804864$ the command gives me an error which I interpret as Sage not knowing where to compute or that I have not fixed an embedding of the number field. How do I fix an embedding and compute |

2022-03-27 13:14:53 +0200 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |

2022-03-27 13:14:51 +0200 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |

2022-03-27 13:14:40 +0200 | edited question | Fix a number field embedding for a newform for $\Gamma_0(N)$ Fix a number field embedding for a newform for $\Gamma_0(N)$ I am trying to do some numerics with newforms for $\Gamma_0 |

2022-03-27 12:28:25 +0200 | commented answer | Fix a number field embedding for a newform for $\Gamma_0(N)$ That is exactly what I was hoping for. Great answer! |

2022-03-27 09:15:42 +0200 | edited question | Fix a number field embedding for a newform for $\Gamma_0(N)$ Fix a number field embedding for a newform for $\Gamma_0(N)$ I am trying to do some numerics with newforms for $\Gamma_0 |

2022-03-27 09:14:49 +0200 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |

2022-03-27 09:14:49 +0200 | edited question | Fix a number field embedding for a newform for $\Gamma_0(N)$ Fix a number field embedding for a newform for $\Gamma_0(N)$ I am trying to do some numerics with newforms for $\Gamma_0 |

2022-03-27 08:52:49 +0200 | received badge | ● Student (source) |

2022-03-27 08:43:57 +0200 | asked a question | Fix a number field embedding for a newform for $\Gamma_0(N)$ Fix an number field embedding for a newforms for Gamma0(N) I am trying to do some numerics with new forms for $\Gamma_0( |

Copyright Sage, 2010. Some rights reserved under creative commons license. Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.