2022-11-14 07:45:23 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |

2022-02-19 18:58:36 +0200 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |

2022-02-19 18:53:24 +0200 | commented answer | Solve much slower than Mathematica for simple system This is significantly faster. Unfortunately it is still orders of magnitude behind Mathematica and I need to repeat this |

2022-02-19 13:00:07 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Answer (source) |

2022-02-19 12:08:27 +0200 | received badge | ● Self-Learner (source) |

2022-02-19 12:08:27 +0200 | received badge | ● Teacher (source) |

2022-02-18 21:27:21 +0200 | edited question | Solve much slower than Mathematica for simple system Speeding up solve for a simple system Mathematica solves the following system of multivariate polynomials almost instant |

2022-02-18 19:57:18 +0200 | asked a question | Solve much slower than Mathematica for simple system Speeding up solve for a simple system Mathematica solves the following system of multivariate polynomials almost instant |

2022-02-18 19:48:13 +0200 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |

2022-02-18 19:48:13 +0200 | edited answer | Solve with the assumption z!=0 I fixed this by adding an additional variable: solve([x,y*z,a*z-1],x,y,z,a,solution_dict=True) |

2022-02-18 19:47:54 +0200 | answered a question | Solve with the assumption z!=0 I fixed this by adding an additional variable: 'solve([x,yz,az-1],x,y,z,a,solution_dict=True)' |

2022-02-18 10:42:32 +0200 | received badge | ● Student (source) |

2022-02-18 10:40:54 +0200 | asked a question | Solve with the assumption z!=0 Solve with the assumption z!=0 When I try to solve the following with the assumption z is nonzero solve still outputs th |

Copyright Sage, 2010. Some rights reserved under creative commons license. Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.