2024-03-01 21:32:57 +0200 | received badge | ● Good Question (source) |
2024-02-23 20:04:18 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2023-01-30 18:53:34 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2023-01-30 18:53:34 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2022-06-01 11:28:32 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2022-02-14 21:34:58 +0200 | commented answer | Why specifying `stylesheet` parameter in plot function causes error? Thanks, that helps. |
2022-02-14 21:34:26 +0200 | commented answer | Why specifying `stylesheet` parameter in plot function causes error? Thank you for an answer. That's a good workaround, but unfortunately still requires too much typing. Also, I can't figur |
2022-02-14 21:31:04 +0200 | commented answer | Why specifying `stylesheet` parameter in plot function causes error? Thank you for an answer. That's a good workaround, but unfortunately still requires too much typing. |
2022-02-13 12:45:42 +0200 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2022-02-13 12:45:42 +0200 | edited question | Why specifying `stylesheet` parameter in plot function causes error? Why specifying `stylesheet` parameter in plot function causes error? I'm disappointed by how the default plot style look |
2022-02-13 12:44:24 +0200 | asked a question | Why specifying `stylesheet` parameter in plot function causes error? Why specifying `stylesheet` parameter in plot function causes error? I'm disappointed by how the default plot style look |
2021-10-07 19:01:14 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2021-10-07 11:45:38 +0200 | commented answer | Diagonalize matrix numerically over $\mathbb{C}$ Is there a way to display the numerically-looking numbers the way sympy does it? I.e. sqrt(2) instead of 1.414213562373 |
2021-10-07 11:45:23 +0200 | commented answer | Diagonalize matrix numerically over $\mathbb{C}$ Is there a way to display the numerically-looking numbers the sympy does it? I.e. sqrt(2) instead of 1.414213562373? |
2021-10-07 11:42:28 +0200 | commented answer | Diagonalize matrix numerically over $\mathbb{C}$ Thank you for a good answer, I accepted it. My mistake was I didn't try other fields. I should have googled for algebrai |
2021-10-07 11:41:19 +0200 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2021-10-07 11:38:38 +0200 | marked best answer | Diagonalize matrix numerically over $\mathbb{C}$ Suppose I have a matrix m: $$ m = \left(\begin{array}{rr} 2 & -3 \\ 1 & 0 \end{array}\right). $$ It is diagonalizable and has complex eigenvalues. I now want to diagonalize it, but get an error: When I specify the field So, apparently, Sage is trying to diagonalize the matrix symbolically, i.e. exactly. But what if I don't care about exactness and just want a straightforward numerical answer? This is how I would do it with Notice that the output is actually exact. I know I can run this same Python code in Sage, but I assume there's a more native way to do it. To sum up, how do I get Sage to diagonalize a matrix over $\mathbb{C}$? How do I change the code if I only need the numerical answer? |
2021-10-07 11:38:38 +0200 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2021-10-07 11:12:54 +0200 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2021-10-07 11:02:56 +0200 | asked a question | Diagonalize matrix numerically over $\mathbb{C}$ Diagonalize matrix numerically over $\mathbb{C}$ Suppose I have a matrix m: $$ m = \left(\begin{array}{rr} 2 & -3 \ |