2021-10-07 19:01:14 +0100 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |

2021-10-07 11:45:38 +0100 | commented answer | Diagonalize matrix numerically over $\mathbb{C}$ Is there a way to display the numerically-looking numbers the way sympy does it? I.e. sqrt(2) instead of 1.414213562373 |

2021-10-07 11:45:23 +0100 | commented answer | Diagonalize matrix numerically over $\mathbb{C}$ Is there a way to display the numerically-looking numbers the sympy does it? I.e. sqrt(2) instead of 1.414213562373? |

2021-10-07 11:42:28 +0100 | commented answer | Diagonalize matrix numerically over $\mathbb{C}$ Thank you for a good answer, I accepted it. My mistake was I didn't try other fields. I should have googled for algebrai |

2021-10-07 11:41:19 +0100 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |

2021-10-07 11:38:38 +0100 | marked best answer | Diagonalize matrix numerically over $\mathbb{C}$ Suppose I have a matrix m: $$ m = \left(\begin{array}{rr} 2 & -3 \\ 1 & 0 \end{array}\right). $$ It is diagonalizable and has complex eigenvalues. I now want to diagonalize it, but get an error: When I specify the field So, apparently, Sage is trying to diagonalize the matrix symbolically, i.e. exactly. But what if I don't care about exactness and just want a straightforward numerical answer? This is how I would do it with Notice that the output is actually exact. I know I can run this same Python code in Sage, but I assume there's a more native way to do it. To sum up, |

2021-10-07 11:38:38 +0100 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |

2021-10-07 11:12:54 +0100 | received badge | ● Student (source) |

2021-10-07 11:02:56 +0100 | asked a question | Diagonalize matrix numerically over $\mathbb{C}$ Diagonalize matrix numerically over $\mathbb{C}$ Suppose I have a matrix m: $$ m = \left(\begin{array}{rr} 2 & -3 \ |

Copyright Sage, 2010. Some rights reserved under creative commons license. Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.