20230221 14:55:33 +0200  received badge  ● Notable Question (source) 
20230212 05:05:35 +0200  received badge  ● Famous Question (source) 
20221229 16:25:16 +0200  received badge  ● Notable Question (source) 
20221015 13:40:55 +0200  received badge  ● Popular Question (source) 
20221006 16:15:40 +0200  received badge  ● Notable Question (source) 
20221006 16:15:40 +0200  received badge  ● Popular Question (source) 
20221004 00:44:39 +0200  commented answer  finding 4torsion point on elliptic curve https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/arithmetic_curves/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_point.html 
20220413 02:22:59 +0200  marked best answer  ExtGCD in Finite Fields I want to implement Extended GCD with SageMath so that the internal can be printed. The below is a modification of this. This should be straightforward, however, I might miss something; In the end, I've got the assertion error Any idea to solve this? 
20220413 02:22:58 +0200  commented answer  ExtGCD in Finite Fields I see. I rather consider calculating it over the finite field instead of polynomials. Since the polynomials are always l 
20220412 11:14:57 +0200  edited question  ExtGCD in Finite Fields ExtGCD in Finite Fields I want to implement Extended GCD with SageMath so that the internal can be printed. The below is 
20220412 11:02:29 +0200  asked a question  ExtGCD in Finite Fields ExtGCD in Finite Fields I want to implement Extended GCD with SageMath so that the internal can be printed. The below is 
20220205 12:52:08 +0200  received badge  ● Popular Question (source) 
20211207 15:47:37 +0200  received badge  ● Famous Question (source) 
20211110 19:16:40 +0200  commented answer  Using SageMath Finite Field Extension on Python. This should be the code. You have forgotten the ** instead of ^ from sage.all import * F = GF(2) R = F['x']; (x,) = R. 
20211110 19:04:19 +0200  commented answer  Using SageMath Finite Field Extension on Python. This should be the code. You have forgotten the ** instead of ^ from sage.all import * F = GF(2) R = F['x']; (x,) = R. 
20211110 18:41:27 +0200  marked best answer  Using SageMath Finite Field Extension on Python. Yes, I want to the reverse, use the SageMath in Python. I've seen this on ask.sagemath and stackoverflow I want to use this in Python The python code the Is there a way to do this in python? My final aim is finding the multiplicative inverse of an element using python with the sagemath import. 
20211110 18:41:21 +0200  commented answer  Using SageMath Finite Field Extension on Python. This should be the code. You have forgotten the ** instead of ^ from sage.all import * F = GF(2) R = F['x']; (x,) = R. 
20211110 17:44:41 +0200  edited question  Using SageMath Finite Field Extension on Python. Using SageMath Finite Field Extension on Python. Yes, I want to the reverse, use the SageMath in Python. I've seen this 
20211110 17:43:18 +0200  asked a question  Using SageMath Finite Field Extension on Python. Using SageMath Finite Field Extension on Python. Yes, I want to the reverse, use the SageMath in Python. I've seen this 
20211103 19:05:08 +0200  commented answer  Change of variables in symbolic computation Also, I've seen this answer of yours and the function is not working, at least for me. Something has changed with Python 
20211103 19:04:41 +0200  commented answer  Change of variables in symbolic computation Also, I've seen this answer of yours and the function is not working, at least for me. 
20211103 19:04:16 +0200  commented answer  Change of variables in symbolic computation Also, I've seen this answer of yours and the function is not working, at least for me. 
20211103 18:59:39 +0200  commented answer  Change of variables in symbolic computation I guess substitute_expression is for something else, however, I couldn't find it in the docs. 
20211103 09:39:49 +0200  marked best answer  Change of variables in symbolic computation I need to change This produces an error on the 4th line; What is the proper way to change the variables? 
20211102 19:11:58 +0200  asked a question  Change of variables in symbolic computation Change of variables in symbolic computation I need to change Y into 1/2 *( y  a1 * x  a3) so that I can change variabl 
20210216 14:53:44 +0200  answered a question  evaluating inverse erf 
20210216 13:50:52 +0200  commented answer  evaluating inverse erf 
20210216 13:47:44 +0200  asked a question  probit, erfinv, and inconsistency with Wikipedia I've used the erfinv and outputs Wikipedia states that $\operatorname{probit}(0.025) = 1.96 = \operatorname{probit}(0.975)$ Interestingly outputs Am I missing a point here? 
20210206 13:18:41 +0200  received badge  ● Enthusiast 
20210119 20:28:01 +0200  commented answer  Solving symbolic equations to IntegerModRing(26) [k_1 + 11x2, k_2 + 11x2, k_3, k_4 + 1, x1 + 23*x2, 2]. I've got this as an experiment, what is the value of k_3 and the last 2? 
20210119 20:24:05 +0200  commented answer  Solving symbolic equations to IntegerModRing(26) No automatic way form basis to eq.sub? 
20210119 20:10:04 +0200  received badge  ● Commentator 
20210119 20:10:04 +0200  commented answer  Solving symbolic equations to IntegerModRing(26) Sorry, $i$ was a typo that takes your time. Is this the only way? I was expecting that the symbolic package can try solve by Gaussian Elimination. 
20210119 17:21:56 +0200  asked a question  Solving symbolic equations to IntegerModRing(26) To solve the Hill Cipher a have setup symbolic equations; There is a problem that The symbolic equations are not working modulo 26. For example, the first equation is So how can I properly turn them into modulo 26 and solve the equations in modulo 26? 
20210116 15:50:02 +0200  marked best answer  Drawing a line not segment I want to draw a line passing through a point P and Q on an elliptic curve. Using this only draw a line segment from P to Q. How can I draw a line? I've looked on the doc but did not see an option for this. Any solution? 
20210116 15:50:02 +0200  commented answer  Drawing a line not segment Sorry, cells mixed! I have put it into a curve defined over GF. Yes, it is working. Thanks. 
20210116 10:56:45 +0200  received badge  ● Notable Question (source) 
20210115 23:58:51 +0200  commented answer  Drawing a line not segment
