2024-06-28 17:44:57 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2024-06-28 17:44:57 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2023-06-25 19:20:52 +0100 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2023-06-25 17:18:23 +0100 | asked a question | Substitution of variable in polynomial not working as expected. Substitution of variable in polynomial not working as expected. R.<x> = SR[] a = SR.var('a') P = a*x P.subs(a=1) |
2022-02-28 08:47:46 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2019-09-13 17:22:20 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2018-09-27 10:38:06 +0100 | asked a question | Load module from remote server Hi, I am using a remote sage notebook public server (such as http://sage.math.canterbury.ac.nz/). I would like to be able to load my own python modules, but I don't know how can I access local files, such as Is there any way to do that? |
2017-09-15 21:00:54 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2017-08-18 00:36:31 +0100 | received badge | ● Taxonomist |
2017-02-14 11:27:23 +0100 | received badge | ● Good Question (source) |
2016-08-09 20:36:05 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2016-04-11 22:28:21 +0100 | commented answer | Possible bug of sum function Thank you, however I find this behavior at least strange. If n is a Sage Integer, I understand range(n) produces a list of Python integers. So in both cases the sum runs over a list of Python integers. However, in one case they are converted into Sage integers and in the other case they aren't. I don't understand why. |
2016-04-11 19:15:50 +0100 | asked a question | Possible bug of sum function Consider the following code: The answers are (using sage 7.1): In the second case sage is using the usual integer division of python 2.x while in the first one it is using the exact representation of rationals. Is this a known bug? |
2015-11-10 21:33:59 +0100 | commented answer | Sagemath server using openid Thank you very much. When you say enable SSL, you mean something as explained in https://www.digitalocean.com/communit... ? |
2015-11-08 20:34:56 +0100 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2015-11-08 20:31:31 +0100 | asked a question | Sagemath server using openid Is it difficult to allow users to create accounts on our Sagemath server using openid authentication? In fact, we would like to use the gmail implementation of openid since our university email is managed by Google. Any hints, please? |
2015-05-06 08:27:16 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2015-05-06 08:27:16 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2014-11-19 17:07:44 +0100 | asked a question | Typeset mode in iPython notebook Hi, I'm trying to set typeset mode = True using the iPython notebook in Sage 6.4, but I don't find how to do it. Is it already implemented? |
2014-10-20 00:44:26 +0100 | asked a question | integral should not be zero yields 0, the expected answer is 8. |
2014-10-10 12:06:39 +0100 | commented answer | Problem with solution_dict=True Version is 6.3. Seems to me sagenb is using an old version without the bug. |
2014-10-09 15:48:51 +0100 | asked a question | Problem with solution_dict=True yields AttributeError: 'list' object has no attribute 'left' Is this a bug? |
2014-06-29 21:27:49 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2014-06-29 21:27:49 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2014-06-29 21:27:49 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2014-02-12 04:45:46 +0100 | asked a question | Missing solution in homogeneous equation returns only the solution x=0, missing y=0. Is this a known bug? I am using sage 5.13. |
2013-12-12 03:45:49 +0100 | asked a question | Sage plot inner structure Hi, I would like to manipulate the raw data of a plot. More specifically, I'd like to get the set of points produced by implicit_plot in order to use it for another task. Is that possible? |
2013-09-29 17:17:41 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2013-02-14 18:49:34 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2013-01-30 04:00:32 +0100 | commented question | (abs(sin(x))^2).simplify_full() Here, using Ubuntu 12.04, it consistently yields abs(sin(x))^2. Please note that the similar input abs(sin(x)^2).simplify_full() produces the right answer. Version 5.5 does not have this problem. |
2013-01-30 03:33:41 +0100 | received badge | ● Citizen Patrol (source) |
2013-01-29 10:07:09 +0100 | asked a question | (abs(sin(x))^2).simplify_full() I think (abs(sin(x))^2).simplify_full() should render sin(x)^2. This is not the case in sage 5.6 even with the assumption assume(x, 'real'). Is this a [known] bug? |
2012-10-09 08:09:01 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2011-12-19 06:10:53 +0100 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2011-12-16 12:40:02 +0100 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2011-12-15 13:15:11 +0100 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2011-12-15 09:30:18 +0100 | asked a question | Solve a simple system of non-linear equations Maple can solve a system of equations such as $\sin x + y =0, \sin x - y =0$. However, var('x y') solve([sin(x) + y ==0, sin(x) - y==0], [x, y]) produces no useful answer. Is there any other way to proceed? |