2024-04-02 20:09:11 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2024-04-02 17:03:06 +0200 | commented answer | Dynamic documentation, how to use EXAMPLE:: tag? Great, thanks! Olivier |
2024-04-02 16:33:19 +0200 | asked a question | Dynamic documentation, how to use EXAMPLE:: tag? Dynamic documentation, how to use EXAMPLE:: tag? Dear all, I'm writing the documentation of a package. A function des |
2023-02-24 10:21:09 +0200 | commented question | Eigenvalues of an integral operators Yes, G(F)(y). A basic answer consists in approximating the integral. Wiith Simpson's formula, this gives def GetEigenva |
2023-02-24 09:49:35 +0200 | commented question | Eigenvalues of an integral operators Yes, G(F)(y). A basic answer consists in approximating the integral. Wiith Simpson's formula, this gives def GetEigenva |
2023-02-24 09:48:28 +0200 | commented question | Eigenvalues of an integral operators Yes, G(F)(y). A basic answer consists in approximating the integral, and for instance, with Simpson's formula, this give |
2023-02-24 09:46:44 +0200 | commented question | Eigenvalues of an integral operators Yes, G(F)(y). A basic answer consists in approximating the integral, and for instance, with Simpson's formula, this give |
2023-02-23 10:59:14 +0200 | asked a question | Eigenvalues of an integral operators Eigenvalues of an integral operators Dear all, I want to find the first eigenvalues (and even the eigenvectors if pos |
2022-10-23 05:31:05 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2022-09-22 09:26:22 +0200 | commented answer | Clipping a 2D plot Many thanks for all that! I had misinterpreted the meaning of xmax, xmin, ymax, ymin family :/ Best, O. |
2022-09-21 13:56:06 +0200 | asked a question | Clipping a 2D plot Clipping a 2D plot Dear all, Best is a small example: ``` def fC(p): return([p[0]/(p[0]+2), (p[1]+1)/(p[0]+2)]) |
2022-02-07 00:33:22 +0200 | received badge | ● Self-Learner (source) |
2022-02-07 00:33:22 +0200 | received badge | ● Teacher (source) |
2022-02-07 00:11:37 +0200 | answered a question | max unevaled in plot?? Sorry for the noise, I'm seeing the light -- I should have written ``` def ff(b): return(max([b, 1-b])) show(plot |
2022-02-06 23:57:58 +0200 | asked a question | max unevaled in plot?? max unevaled in plot?? Dear all, Here is a puzzling code: ``` var('a') show(plot(max([1-a, a]), (a,0,1))) show(plot |
2020-08-31 23:40:43 +0200 | commented answer | Iteration over a Combinations(alist, 5).list() Oh, merci (que je me sens cruche :) ! Mais soulagé !) |
2020-08-30 15:52:38 +0200 | asked a question | Iteration over a Combinations(alist, 5).list() Dear all, I have a big set built as : Combinations([1,2,3,4,5,6,7], 5).list() through which I need to iterate. In real life, the list [1,2,3,4,5,6,7] has 72 components. I don't need this set of combinations, only to iterate through it. I did not find the proper way to do that with the combinat package, but I have the feeling I overlooked something. Many thanks if you have infos on this issue! Best, O. |
2020-08-02 18:40:17 +0200 | commented answer | Timing : are hurwitz_zeta values cached? Thanks for the syntax in Arb to get the Hurwitz-zeta! |
2020-08-02 18:37:53 +0200 | received badge | ● Autobiographer |
2020-08-02 12:50:38 +0200 | asked a question | Timing : are hurwitz_zeta values cached? Dear all, It seems the values of hurwitz_zeta are cached in some way. This makes sense, but I couldn't find documentation on that issue, and in particular, on how to clear the cache: I want to time several instances of a script and need to start afresh each time. Here is an ECM: Then start afresh, get a similar answer. I am pretty sure this system-caching mechanism is explained somewhere but my morning queries drew a blank -- Pointers would be appreciated! Best, Olivier |
2020-08-02 00:12:42 +0200 | asked a question | change_ring for DirichletGroup: some initialisation is required for ComplexIntervalField? Dear all, A code will better explain my predicament: Then do it a second time: The mystery gets more mysterious if one tries it with 'ComplexField' rather than with 'ComplexIntervalField': everything goes smoothly. Here is thus my way out: Maybe there is something simple I didn't get that would avoid the above manipulation? Many thanks in advance! Olivier |
2020-07-31 12:47:54 +0200 | commented answer | Complex roots of non-squarefree real polynomial Oups, many thanks, 'p.roots()' works like a charm! I guess 'complex_roots(p)' must be kept for more specific usage. Best, O. |
2020-07-31 09:34:25 +0200 | asked a question | Complex roots of non-squarefree real polynomial Dear all, I need in my script the maximum of the absolute value of the roots of a polynomial. I don't know the polynomial the user will introduce, so it may well be non squarefree and with non-integer coefficients. Here is something that baffled me for some time: The mystery is not so hard to pierce, I think: But then, I still have my initial problem! I can use some apriori bound for these roots. I'm still unhappy of not being able to get a better numerical approximation -- Many thanks for your lights! Olivier |
2020-07-19 16:06:48 +0200 | commented answer | Spline interpolation varies hugely when variables are rescaled in 3d-lists ? Ok, now I understand that aspect_ratio modifies only the rendering and has no effect on the datas produced. I also tried adding C = ComplexField(200) and replacing zeta(fx(x/nx) + I*fy(y/ny)) by C(zeta(fx(x/nx) + I*fy(y/ny))) with the same output. |
2020-07-12 11:56:35 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2020-07-12 01:52:41 +0200 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2020-07-11 15:06:35 +0200 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2020-07-11 15:05:32 +0200 | asked a question | Spline interpolation varies hugely when variables are rescaled in 3d-lists ? Dear all, Here is a short script: Now modify the z-coordinate: replace "5 * abs(zeta...)" by "abs(zeta...)" The resulting graph is essentially flat. Can anyone tell me what is happening there? Also, I would like to get rid of my scaling parameters 30 and 5 by using frame_aspect_ratio, to get cleaner code and a better annoted frame, but I don't seem to understand how to do it. A great many thanks for anyone who would take the time to teach me that, it is some hours that I'm struggling with some docs and examples without having reached much -- Best, Olivier |
2019-08-07 14:05:06 +0200 | asked a question | unable to simplify to a complex interval approximation Dear all, Once simplified, here is the problem. This is something that goes smoothly with Sage 8.6 and not with Sage 8.1. It turns out that Sage 8.1 is the one bundled with Ubuntu 18.04 LTS so I'm interested in solving this issue. I'm also interested in this question in itself. Here it is: C = ComplexIntervalField(200) C(-psi(1/3)) That work's just fine in Sage 8.6 but Sage 8.1 answers: TypeError: unable to simplify to a complex interval approximation Of course C(psi(1/3)) works just fine. Many thanks in advance |