2023-07-23 08:11:05 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2023-07-23 08:11:05 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2018-11-14 19:02:48 +0200 | commented answer | Rename Lambda in weight space Great, thanks! It's at least more elegant than overwriting |
2018-11-14 15:53:24 +0200 | asked a question | Rename Lambda in weight space It's a basic question, but after looking at the manual for a while I couldn't find the answer, so here goes. returns |
2018-11-12 10:35:10 +0200 | commented answer | Are subtypes of Cartan types implemented correctly? Thanks! We'll just work around it for now, maybe I'll have a go at improving Sage in the future. |
2018-11-12 10:34:47 +0200 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2018-11-12 10:34:44 +0200 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2018-11-07 01:51:01 +0200 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2018-11-06 17:01:22 +0200 | asked a question | Are subtypes of Cartan types implemented correctly? Consider the following code It gives in Sage 8.4. Is it wrong to expect the index set of a subtype to be the subset used in defining the subtype? From my point of view this inconsistency leads to all kinds of unexpected behaviour in the relabellings for subtypes, but maybe it is intentional? |