2021-01-20 04:15:38 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2020-07-09 16:00:52 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2020-05-12 01:35:56 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2019-03-18 18:47:47 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2018-08-31 19:45:16 +0200 | commented answer | Sage could be even more clever - How to force the use of 'sympy' backend for simplifying symbolic integrals? Thanks, that was the workaround I was looking for! |
2018-08-16 19:02:38 +0200 | commented answer | Solved: Why does integrate(psi(y)*f(y),y) return an error but integrate(psi(t,y)*f(t,y),y) works? That's good to know, I'll take it as an exception then -- and nothing better to understand the software then a bug being explained! |
2018-08-16 18:56:40 +0200 | commented answer | Solved: Why does integrate(psi(y)*f(y),y) return an error but integrate(psi(t,y)*f(t,y),y) works? seems to be a whitespace indent Found it! |
2018-08-16 18:54:20 +0200 | asked a question | Sage could be even more clever - How to force the use of 'sympy' backend for simplifying symbolic integrals? Hi there, I have noticed the following problem: The workaround seems to be using the which always seems to be a good idea as I learned from @Emmanuel Charpentier over here. Now I would like to force the use of TL;DR How can I force sage to pull out these type of exponential constants from the integral with the |
2018-08-16 17:50:40 +0200 | received badge | ● Good Question (source) |
2018-08-16 17:37:46 +0200 | commented answer | Solved: Why does integrate(psi(y)*f(y),y) return an error but integrate(psi(t,y)*f(t,y),y) works? Thank you for the quick answer! I struggled to format my post -- what are the html tags for the nice verbatim code block? |
2018-08-16 17:25:01 +0200 | commented answer | Solved: Why does integrate(psi(y)*f(y),y) return an error but integrate(psi(t,y)*f(t,y),y) works? Thank you very much, that is a very thorough answer! Just started playing around with SAGE, didn't expect the underlying cracks to show up that quickly.... Do you think I should file another ticket or can I somehow 'push' yours? |
2018-08-16 17:21:58 +0200 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2018-08-16 17:21:46 +0200 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2018-08-13 19:12:26 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2018-08-08 15:33:05 +0200 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2018-08-08 14:43:48 +0200 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2018-08-08 14:23:22 +0200 | asked a question | Solved: Why does integrate(psi(y)*f(y),y) return an error but integrate(psi(t,y)*f(t,y),y) works? Hi there, I am trying get an symbolic expression for the convolution $$ (\psi \star f)(x) := \int\limits_{\mathbb{R}} \psi(x-y) f(y) {d y} $$ of two functions $ f, \psi: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} $ as follows:
upon which I get the error message
If I add an extra argument to the two functions and define them as $$ f, \psi : \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} $$ as follows:
there is a surprise, it suddenly works! I get the desired symbolic expression on which I can run diff(..,x) and all the other built-in functions. TL;DR
Why does Solution
Use sympy backend for symbolic integration as in
|