2022-07-22 13:37:38 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2022-02-18 13:49:17 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2019-01-01 10:21:46 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2018-07-11 13:52:33 +0200 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2018-06-26 22:21:02 +0200 | commented answer | linux binary seems to be source ah yes that did the trick. Temporarily commenting out the Anaconda line in .bashrc, and uncommenting it again after Sage did its thing. Thanks!!!!! |
2018-06-26 20:13:18 +0200 | commented answer | linux binary seems to be source oh after an hour the build failed :( pfff it is getting too hard. I was hoping for a osx-like self-contained complete package :) still getting used to linux and a slightly more complex way of doing things. Ok I postpone all this for another day. If you or anyone has any ideas how to install Sage on Linux Mint, I am all ears! |
2018-06-26 19:49:11 +0200 | commented answer | linux binary seems to be source yes I have conda. python --version returns: Python 3.6.4 :: Anaconda custom (64-bit) If that is the cause, the error message is less than helpful... Now I am compiling from source from the source files. I see it compiles its own python... what does it matter which python I have one could say. Or at least, maybe it is a good idea to put in the readme's that I not only need OpenSSL, but also Python 2. We'll see what the compiling brings. thanks for your answer! |
2018-06-26 16:57:08 +0200 | asked a question | linux binary seems to be source I followed the link "Linux binaries" from the Download page, which leads to a page titles "Binaries for Linux" for which I do not have enough karma to post the exact url, but it is sagemath dot org slash download minus linux dot html. As recommended I downloaded the torrent version of sage-8.2-Ubuntu_16.04-x86_64.tar.bz2 But ./sage gives this result: |